Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(446)
-
▼
February
(45)
- AU IP/Gender: Panel IV: Gendered Understandings of...
- AU IP/Gender Panel III: US Federal Courts
- AU IP/Gender: Lunch Keynote by Kara Swanson
- AU IP/Gender Panel II: Documenting Communities of ...
- AU IP/Gender Panel I: Women's Leadership in Tradit...
- AU/IP Gender conference, part 1: me
- UDRP expenses count as injury for purposes of TM case
- Irreparable harm teleseminar: rescheduled for March 6
- kitsch doesn't violate the right of publicity
- Transformative work of the day, Power Rangers edition
- Fair Use Week!
- Trademark/right of publicity questions of the day
- False claims of third-party endorsement actionable...
- Transformative work of the day, superhero edition
- Allegations of fake independent reviews state fals...
- Misappropriating goodwill of abandoned mark is fal...
- Fox hurts America yet again, losing fair use sj mo...
- returned goods sold as new were infringing, false ...
- New article on innovation in copyright licensing
- Allegations of trademark "theft" falsifiable; othe...
- AU IP/Gender conference (with a keynote from me)
- Third Circuit affirms competitor's victory in coll...
- False advertising claims over music licensing survive
- gay conversion therapy as NJCFA violation
- fake reviews actionable; unflattering comparison not
- Shore loser: "shorebilly" mark invalid for fraud
- Another keyword defendant victory, among other tor...
- Public comments on proposed DMCA classes
- false claim of gov't affiliation not actionable by...
- No TM or false advertising claims without use of m...
- WIPIP, part 2, Session 3 Trademark
- WIPIP, Part 2, Session 2, Trademark
- WIPIP, part 2: Copyright
- WIPIP Session 4, Cross-IP
- WIPIP Session 3: Copyright
- WIPIP Session 2: Trademark
- WIPIP session 1: Trademark
- IP question of the day, Harper Lee edition
- New article: images and the right of publicity
- Reading list: Craswell on sports team nicknames
- 230 defeats false advertising claim against search...
- Pom squad at the DC Circuit
- Laches bars Fitbug's TM claim against Fitbit
- Dastar doesn't bar true reverse passing off claim
- failure to conform exclusion precludes insurance c...
-
▼
February
(45)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
2 comments:
Hello,
On March 3 I am going to Maryland District Court on an action that I have brought pro se against Encore Marketing International and Easy Saver Reward for violation of The Maryland Consumer Protection Act, Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practice. My research took me, only today, to your June 21, 2012 post "credit card info passthrough not deceptive" which I read with enormous interest, as this is precisely the issue at bar with me. I was curious who you are and found today's post from 45 minutes ago. First of all, thank you for your very clear 2012 post on a complex subject. Secondly, I have no questions but was merely curious; are you an attorney?
Again, thank you,
Steven L. Joffe, M.D.
Lutherville, MD
stevejoffe@comcast.net
I'm a professor at Georgetown; however, I cannot offer legal advice on specific cases.
Post a Comment