Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(446)
-
▼
February
(45)
- AU IP/Gender: Panel IV: Gendered Understandings of...
- AU IP/Gender Panel III: US Federal Courts
- AU IP/Gender: Lunch Keynote by Kara Swanson
- AU IP/Gender Panel II: Documenting Communities of ...
- AU IP/Gender Panel I: Women's Leadership in Tradit...
- AU/IP Gender conference, part 1: me
- UDRP expenses count as injury for purposes of TM case
- Irreparable harm teleseminar: rescheduled for March 6
- kitsch doesn't violate the right of publicity
- Transformative work of the day, Power Rangers edition
- Fair Use Week!
- Trademark/right of publicity questions of the day
- False claims of third-party endorsement actionable...
- Transformative work of the day, superhero edition
- Allegations of fake independent reviews state fals...
- Misappropriating goodwill of abandoned mark is fal...
- Fox hurts America yet again, losing fair use sj mo...
- returned goods sold as new were infringing, false ...
- New article on innovation in copyright licensing
- Allegations of trademark "theft" falsifiable; othe...
- AU IP/Gender conference (with a keynote from me)
- Third Circuit affirms competitor's victory in coll...
- False advertising claims over music licensing survive
- gay conversion therapy as NJCFA violation
- fake reviews actionable; unflattering comparison not
- Shore loser: "shorebilly" mark invalid for fraud
- Another keyword defendant victory, among other tor...
- Public comments on proposed DMCA classes
- false claim of gov't affiliation not actionable by...
- No TM or false advertising claims without use of m...
- WIPIP, part 2, Session 3 Trademark
- WIPIP, Part 2, Session 2, Trademark
- WIPIP, part 2: Copyright
- WIPIP Session 4, Cross-IP
- WIPIP Session 3: Copyright
- WIPIP Session 2: Trademark
- WIPIP session 1: Trademark
- IP question of the day, Harper Lee edition
- New article: images and the right of publicity
- Reading list: Craswell on sports team nicknames
- 230 defeats false advertising claim against search...
- Pom squad at the DC Circuit
- Laches bars Fitbug's TM claim against Fitbit
- Dastar doesn't bar true reverse passing off claim
- failure to conform exclusion precludes insurance c...
-
▼
February
(45)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (948)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1657)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3080)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (185)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (309)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
2 comments:
This is killing me. What's with the w? #notabigenoughnerd
No Wonder Woman, and no other women, but WW would be the most glaring omission.
Post a Comment