Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(598)
-
▼
August
(53)
- Satirical picture doesn't make rest of blog post m...
- How we talk about politics
- Google's geotargeting claims may be actionable
- When does the right of publicity trump a TM?
- Anthropological Quarterly special issue on pirates
- Pitch to healthcare providers may necessarily impl...
- Trademark use?
- Judge Posner on trusting an author
- Herding cats: follow-on Clorox class action proceeds
- Health insurers offering coupons for food?
- replacing manufacturer's mark with repairer's mark...
- Distrust that particular flavor: standing challeng...
- If you are being nasty, is it more likely you are ...
- No injunction, no cause of action under private AG...
- Empirical study on trademarks as keywords
- A case with legs? Supplier suing retailer for fals...
- Accusing competitor of wanting customers to get su...
- Sarah Burstein on design patents and Apple v. Samsung
- "duty to police" as excuse for bullying
- "revolutionary, new" claims could be false if comp...
- Amazon doesn't have to replicate eBay policies to ...
- Francesca Coppa and Tisha Turk talk vidding
- At the intersection of my interests ...
- Difficult-to-empty gift card didn't violate NY con...
- Dastar bars implicit misrepresentation theory
- False use of (R) justifies Lanham Act injunction w...
- Authorization to sell products under another name ...
- USDA's ability to act on organic products preclude...
- MERS nonjudicial foreclosure may violate Washingto...
- Images and text in scrapbooking
- Asparagus + salmon is scene a faire; plaintiff's k...
- Falsity by necessary implication?
- All in the game: misleading press releases support...
- Pop will eat itself
- IPSC, part 8
- IPSC part 7
- IPSC part 6
- IPSC part 5
- IPSC part 4
- IPSC part 3
- IPSC second breakout session
- IPSC part 1
- Content ID strikes again
- Fraud must be alleged with quotation marks
- Brickfair photos: can't stop the signal
- Book cover of the day
- Pleading agency and vicarious liability with parti...
- Reading list: bait and switch
- Impersonating competitor's endorser does not viola...
- Vacationing in Colorado
- Eric Goldman on the MyVidster opinion
- Claim against follow-on retailer of "toning" shoes...
- What exactly must a false advertising plaintiff pl...
-
▼
August
(53)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment