Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(598)
-
▼
June
(62)
- Supreme Court punts on standing
- FTC releases study about consumer reaction to "up ...
- potential competitor could state false advertising...
- Speaking of parody/satire
- Abortion criticism as fair use: parody/satire muck...
- FCC honors program for new lawyers
- The Stolen Valor Act and advertising/trademark law
- US v. Alvarez
- Copyright myths
- stating a warranty policy that defies the law may ...
- ACPA claims fail in context of pitched competitive...
- Why I now have a .ca domain name
- Highly recommended: Abraham Drassinower on copyrig...
- Judicial deference to administrative agencies?
- Glass House unbroken by Big Brother's copyright/tr...
- Copyright-related links
- initial interest confusion lives to lose another day
- Audience expectations affect literal falsity deter...
- Can mugs be newsworthy?
- Association has standing to bring false advertisin...
- Apple v. Motorola and the meaning of "goodwill"
- Today in hilarious advertising mistakes
- murder on the dancefloor, but not copyrightability
- credit card info passthrough to third party not de...
- ASA ruling on sponsored tweets
- ASA ruling highlights UK/US endorsement divide
- Marketing, packaging, and psychology
- Claim proceeds against alleged mastermind of fake ...
- LV's Hangover infringement claim loses on motion t...
- Tool time
- Rock 'n roller cola wars
- Careers in advertising law teleconference
- Car title lender's arbitration agreement unenforce...
- No standing for consumer not exposed to misreprese...
- repeated violations allow new UCL claims even afte...
- Claim to be exclusive owner of TM rights triggers ...
- Smaller company can't plausibly allege harm from s...
- NY reiterates that justifiable reliance isn't an e...
- TM claims brought as consumer protection claims su...
- UK Advertising Standards Authority and user-genera...
- Treating images differently
- Forward-looking claims in government bids not fals...
- Copyright and real property metaphors
- The Rogers test gets new life
- False educational promises, part 2
- False educational promises, part 1
- lawsuit over undisclosed cable fees proceeds
- Seller can claim patent infringement and product i...
- falsely taking credit isn't disparagement for ad i...
- Carfax damage reports as unfair trade practice
- Fandom/professionalism/copyright
- The question is, which is to be master?
- Shouldn't we give up on the "brand as adjective" r...
- Remixing to create a version of an existing work
- Business models in the digital age
- DMCA: personal copying
- DMCA: jailbreaking
- DMCA: accessibilty
- DMCA: the light dawns on me
- DMCA: remix
- DMCA: documentaries, fictional film and ebooks
- DMCA hearing, part 1
-
▼
June
(62)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment