data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fc26/8fc260879322fcca7f66dcc950889b43df56e58b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1dce6/1dce6d58856977f1b0ef4dc8d46e6a34fd90e8c9" alt="".jpg)
In Virginia, a pet store's "Woof Trap" display (Wolf Trap is a local concert venue) with various pet-themed bands.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c34e/2c34e4ed2d7488cda28c1a3c399553f592f9f55c" alt="".jpg)
The Kidillac, a toy from about 1953, according to the Smithsonian Museum of American History, a gift of Elmer's Auto & Toy Museum.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/621ab/621ab39692d01e9094d7af333c6dbc6fd3c75bd1" alt=""
If you represented the respective trademark owners, which if any of these would impel you to write a letter? How good would your dilution claims be?
1 comment:
Well we know that Ringling's lawyers *will* write the letter. And I'm stunned that Cadillac is still an effective mark in light of the Kidillac.
Post a Comment