Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(334)
-
▼
August
(33)
- Outlet sales of outlet-only clothes under brand na...
- name alone doesn't ID average people in internet s...
- Comparison to former licensor's products isn't tra...
- "100% grated parmesan cheese" doesn't have to be a...
- Advertising question of the day: Honeycrisp or hon...
- "universal" is generic for churches
- state courts do nominative fair use too
- Plaintiff can't win false advertising claim becaus...
- Suing critics using copyright doesn't work
- On the genericity of Velcro/velcro
- Is a ban on the words "climate change" in grants c...
- cy pres-only settlement ok'd in Google privacy case
- 4th Cir. holds certification nonprofit's self-prom...
- Tag-along state UDAP claim leads to $18.5 million ...
- Bad dilution claims are so common that they aren't...
- reading list: Willis on remedies for consumer fraud
- Comparative advertising using P's logo is nominati...
- taking customer list as conversion; false claims o...
- Barton Beebe & Jeanne Fromer's submission to PTO o...
- Traveling pictures: trademark/publicity rights que...
- Shoes and surveys (picture post)
- IPSC Breakout Session V
- IPSC Breakout Session IV
- IPSC Breakout Session III
- Transformative work of the day, Richard Siken edition
- IPSC Breakout Session II
- 2017 IPSC Conference at Cardozo School of Law
- false patent marking falls w/false advertising claim
- #1 is puffery, but 2-to-1 preference claims aren't
- Post-Star Athletica question: input sought
- A few more ICE tidbits courtesy of FOIA
- Reading list: worthwhile terms of service?
- The South (Butt) remembers
-
▼
August
(33)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
3 comments:
No.
No.
I am as unsure now as I was before Star Athletica.
Post a Comment