Monday, April 27, 2015
briefly noted: another court rejects proof of purchase requirement for class ascertainability
Really briefly! In re Scotts EZ Seed Litig. 304 F.R.D. 397 (S.D.N.Y. 2015). It would defeat the purpose of class actions. Also, though, there couldn't be an injunctive relief class after the challenged statement was removed from packaging.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment