HT Zach Schrag
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(446)
-
▼
March
(44)
- Reading list: descriptive and suggestive TMs
- A legitimate affiliation confusion claim?
- Fair use quote of the day
- The cartoonist has no idea how fair use works
- Reading list: Campbell at 21/Sony at 31
- Wannabe competitor lacks standing to challenge fal...
- post-POM claim based on false implication of FDA a...
- Farley and Tsai on the Redskins trademark
- Bad 230 ruling for LivingSocial
- The market for lemon smoothies: injunctive class s...
- court refuses to enjoin consumer protection law on...
- And another commercial advertising or promotion ca...
- commercial advertising or promotion post-Lexmark
- The photocopier and the arc of history
- Materials on privacy and surveillance
- picture of refurbished equipment wasn't literally ...
- Amicus brief in Dryer v. NFL
- Pleading around Dastar?
- "I'm not a regular Republican, I'm a cool Republican"
- How does the doctrine of foreign equivalents apply...
- court certifies 11 state classes in "All Natural" ...
- 9th Circuit reverses preemption finding in consume...
- Insurance misrepresentations could ground claims a...
- It's possible to violate the right of publicity in...
- Transformative work of the day, kaleidoscope edition
- New paper: response to Fishman's Creating Around C...
- Past falsity is no guarantee of present results
- art collector lacks remedy against foundation's cl...
- Foie gras as speech? even so, it can still be chal...
- Copyright preemption bars athletes' right of publi...
- Transformative work of the day, animal edition
- None but Bob Marley's heirs can free our minds
- Transformative use of the day, crossover edition
- Violating taxi regulations isn't unfair competitio...
- You come at the queen, you best not miss: Oprah wi...
- Transformative use of the day, Vancouver edition
- Focus, Grasshopper: infringement isn't false adver...
- PTO descriptiveness finding inadmissible where cou...
- Irreparable harm webinar tomorrow
- UK ad regulator finds Israel falsely advertised
- Pregnancy clinic ads are commercial speech
- Copying graffiti could infringe copyright and trad...
- Court misapplies FTDA, not TDRA, to political speech
- When is a house an advertisement?
-
▼
March
(44)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (268)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1652)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3074)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2039)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
Has to be unregistrable, right? I can't recall anything in the definition of "scandalous" that would cabin it to English...
Post a Comment