Rigsby v. Erie Ins. Co., No. 14-cv-905 (W.D. Wis. Mar. 16, 2015): “It is difficult to imagine how it could not be fair use for an insurer to copy or distribute a photograph for the purpose of evaluating an insured’s claim.”
I thought the holding that the photographs in question lacked originality was even more interesting, although it seems obviously wrong to dismiss because of a failure to plead originality with specificity.
1 comment:
I thought the holding that the photographs in question lacked originality was even more interesting, although it seems obviously wrong to dismiss because of a failure to plead originality with specificity.
Post a Comment