Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
December
(46)
- Taking on notorious criminal's persona is protecte...
- Irrationally sexist advertising
- House brands in Australia
- Firm that refers instead of represents might be fa...
- Leading survey questions
- Genderswapping Bilbo Baggins
- fleeting uses in documentaries are fair, 4th Circu...
- Domain names in the news: political scandal edition
- The ASA and ads for offensive products
- "Natural" plus green imagery not puffery for diape...
- FCC regulation doesn't preempt action against wire...
- The TPP and termination rights
- Descriptive or nominative?
- plaintiff not enough of a competitor to win false ...
- soy and almond milk couldn't deceive reasonable co...
- PTO/NTIA online transactions
- PTO/NTIA access to rights information
- PTO/NTIA: notice and takedown
- PTO/NTIA: Maria Pallante
- PTO/NTIA: remix
- PTO/NTIA hearing: first sale
- PTO/NTIA Green Paper Hearing, statutory damages
- Trademark twofer
- A story about creativity and standing on the shoul...
- Briefly noted: consumers challenging express subst...
- Uber's "tips included" claims lead to driver lawsuit
- Trader Joe's versus HT Traders from Harris Teeter
- TM infringement no matter how dissimilar the marks?
- Learned intermediary doctrine doesn't bar claim at...
- Get used to disappointment
- PTO/NTIA Green Paper public meeting agenda
- competitor can challenge allegedly confusing use o...
- software is a "good" but California claims still fail
- 9th Circuit resoundingly rejects presumption of ir...
- Dilution is more than association: but what more?
- Blurred lines, part 3
- Blurred lines: really part 2 this time
- Blurred Lines: Advertising or Content? An FTC Work...
- perils of automated recommendation ads
- AU’s post-argument panel on Lexmark v. Static Control
- A song about big data
- Eric Goldman previews Lexmark
- eBay seller loses gray goods case
- lawyer who doesn't mediate lacks standing against ...
- distributor's switch to direct sourcing leads to L...
- Publisher can't maintain Lanham Act claim against ...
-
▼
December
(46)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment