Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
November
(36)
- Lexmark post-argument panel at AU
- Bike humor
- The work of art in an age of mechanical demolition?
- Hey Jude, WTH? Competitor plaintiff fails despite ...
- Right of publicity question of the day
- ABA Journal Blawg 100
- coincidental co-creation
- transformative work of the day
- Reply brief in Lexmark v. Static Control
- Retailer's California claims against supplier proceed
- Posner likes trademarks, hates surveys
- Copyright talking points and the TPP
- Name your own price, then pay more: Court upholds ...
- possible internet, eBay sales into US insufficient...
- I'm at io9
- defamation via Twitter, TM infringement via LinkedIn
- PTO/NTIA comments: remix
- It’s a cookbook!
- Foreign Policy covers fanworks
- Some days Starbucks gets the bear, some days the b...
- Is disclosure of recurring charges enough?
- Organization for Transformative Works submits comm...
- Research post available at University of Cambridge
- Surveys in defamation cases?
- November 21st: WIPO Dir. Gen. Gurry at GW Law - Le...
- Law in an Age of Disruptive Technology, Georgetown...
- Bernt Hugenholtz on Flexing Authors' Rights
- Maxim suffers from max delay
- Chat rooms in history
- Can't use your phone on your Delta flight? Blame t...
- HAMP-ed up UCL claim resurrected on appeal
- Misleading health insurance letters?
- No class action against payment processor for mult...
- Peter Jaszi Lecture: Bernt Hugenholtz on Flexing A...
- Soul man is sad man
- Teaching children to see like a state
-
▼
November
(36)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (948)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1657)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3080)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (185)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (309)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment