Defendants are certainly free to
argue that their cover headlines are mere 'opinions' of how Suri was feeling in
the wake of her parents’ divorce. Plaintiff is likewise entitled to demonstrate
that any reasonable reader would interpret Defendants’ headlines as conveying a
verifiable statement of fact about Plaintiff’s conduct. Indeed, Plaintiff has
already submitted survey evidence to Defendants showing that a majority of
readers in fact interpreted the headlines 'Abandoned By Daddy' and 'Abandoned
By Her Dad' as conveying the message that Plaintiff cut Suri out of his life altogether
and on a permanent basis – i.e., that he had severed his relationship with her
and they no longer had any contact whatsoever. Conversely, less than 4% of
readers understood the covers to communicate anything about Suri’s feelings.
I've never heard of a survey in a defamation case before, but I suspect surveys in defamation cases will have the same
problems of manipulability that they do in Lanham Act cases. It’s an
interesting (and likely expensive) development nonetheless.
No comments:
Post a Comment