Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
May
(56)
- USDA approval of chicken soup doesn't preempt all ...
- EZ Seed has rough time in court
- Creation of allegedly fake website leads to broad ...
- Particularity dooms another food case
- FDA approval completely precludes NY false adverti...
- image of competitor's system ok as part of generic...
- Justin Bieber and issue ads
- Via an eagle-eyed student
- Standing and fact pleading, again
- Insurer had duty to defend against its own claim a...
- Implied disparagement covered by insurance, but no...
- Trademark claims survive despite Kirtsaeng first s...
- Sins of a trademark owner: Rogers applies regardle...
- H&R Block can't plausibly plead confusion from com...
- economic loss doctrine doesn't bar New Jersey cons...
- A fresh face in challenges to Del Monte
- Fordham conference book published
- Being fooled by false "sale" ads confers standing ...
- allegations of patent infringement protected by No...
- consumer who knows truth lacks standing for injunc...
- court parses Lanham Act standing on statement by s...
- restitution for deception is the same as restituti...
- Another court rejects waiting for FDA to act on "n...
- Never steal anything from someone you can't outrun...
- Allegedly false equivalence statement triggers ins...
- No reasonable consumer would think diet soda "all-...
- bewildering complexity of modern world makes class...
- Monster un-mash: no class action for YouTube plain...
- Large Wells Fargo judgment reinstated
- $40 million award against Skechers
- To Save Everything, Click Here
- New article: Performance Anxiety
- foisting blame on subcontractor not actionable by ...
- A whiter shade of rhodium
- Remington Steel: false advertising, but not TM inf...
- copyright infringement doesn't confer personal jur...
- Reading list: Koppelman on free speech
- Twitter as new frontier in appropriation art?
- Another twist on music licensing: the re-recording
- Revised, lower Kellogg settlement receives prelimi...
- IPKat on trademark bullying
- Failure to attach full ads renders complaint impla...
- The Archive of Our Own is one of Time's 50 Best We...
- Free Expression Scholars Conference, part 8
- Free Expression Scholars Conference part 7
- Free Expression Scholars Conference part 6
- Free Expression Scholars Conference part 5
- Free Expression Scholars Conference part 4
- Free Expression Scholars Conference part 3
- Free Expression Scholars Conference part 2
- Free Expression Scholars Conference, Yale
- Dastar doesn't deter meritless TM takedown notice ...
- Georgia State amicus brief
- TTAB likely confusion finding not entitled to defe...
- Spam gets in on false confidentiality claims
- So, how soon do we see the lawsuits for stripping ...
-
▼
May
(56)
Labels
- 1201 (16)
- 230 (93)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (279)
- antitrust (47)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (34)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (530)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (42)
- class actions (265)
- cmi (18)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (258)
- conferences (876)
- consumer protection (846)
- contracts (95)
- copying (193)
- copyright (1592)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (148)
- dastar (181)
- defamation (191)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (54)
- dilution (255)
- disclosures (88)
- disparagement (27)
- dmca (197)
- drm (71)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (2871)
- false association (9)
- false designation of origin (2)
- false endorsement (11)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (270)
- fees (34)
- first amendment (419)
- ftc (176)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (42)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (69)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (132)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (105)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (214)
- patents (133)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (261)
- presentations (115)
- privacy (111)
- procedure (144)
- property (17)
- reading list (301)
- remedies (255)
- right of publicity (251)
- secondary liability (174)
- securities (8)
- standing (333)
- surveys (91)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (109)
- trade secrets (77)
- trademark (1951)
- traditional knowledge (10)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (60)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment