Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(598)
-
▼
December
(56)
- Oh Ars Technica no
- Barbie as famous works of art
- Wells Fargo wins appeal on resequencing withdrawals
- 230 doesn't yet bar suit against Apple over intrus...
- No standing when defendant wore noncompeting hat e...
- Studies show people like studies
- Challenges to "natural"/"organic" labels survive m...
- Casual empiricism replaces casual historicism
- Reading List: The Late Age of Print
- Not that this has ever happened to me
- Merely alleging use for commercial purposes insuff...
- The hazards of off-label promotion
- One difference between marketers and trademark law...
- Trademark question of the day
- Bigger end of year news: copyright reform
- End of year news
- Transformation, commerce, and medium
- I predict, therefore I am copyrightable
- Transformative use of the day?
- United States of Pop
- Copying as speech redux
- Caronia dissent points out FDCA's threatened found...
- Prosecuting offlabel promotion as misbranding is u...
- District court upholds strongly worded remedial ci...
- wishy-washy "may enhance" health claim still actio...
- Widespread use of Video Downloader doesn't save in...
- Judge Rogers' dissent: image requirements are just...
- Image-based required disclosures are unconstitutional
- When ex parte situations conceal real legal issues
- Reading list: the laws of image
- No jury trial required on consumer protection claim
- "natural" cooking oil claims mostly but not entire...
- Anticompetitive suit leads to fees even if that ba...
- ingredient whose alleged dangers aren't widely kno...
- I'm dreaming of (a) white chocolate
- Can firms advertise using names of inactive lawyers?
- Copyright nonsense of the day
- Natural versus organic: which claim is easier to m...
- Importer/sales agent could be liable for false adv...
- IPO PTO Day: Copyright infringement via patent app...
- IPO PTO Day: design patents
- IPO PTO Day: the new gTLDs and you
- 4 decades of laches = permanent injunction
- Copyright small claims court?
- Beck, sheet music, and the nature of the musical work
- Consumer surveys don't matter when the court is un...
- Lanham Act claims don't require pleading with part...
- Money damages require harm, but not consumer perce...
- "All natural" class action partially certified
- Today's transformative works
- a label that says "sue me"
- Press release distributed to patient groups is cov...
- Pistachio bins as protectable marks
- state TM infringement without distinctiveness?
- FTC news
- Problem of the day
-
▼
December
(56)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (538)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (53)
- class actions (278)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (272)
- conferences (930)
- consumer protection (970)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (101)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1664)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (161)
- dastar (197)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (32)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3134)
- false association (13)
- false designation of origin (7)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (275)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (444)
- ftc (185)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (137)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (226)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (270)
- presentations (119)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (146)
- property (18)
- reading list (311)
- remedies (282)
- right of publicity (267)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (357)
- surveys (109)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2068)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment