Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(598)
-
▼
September
(56)
- Not sure I would have done this in a moral rights ...
- No contract?
- Imagine if the Constitution were the story of a sm...
- Explicitly false, but not misleading
- Transformative artist of the day
- Advertising and copyright stories in Slate
- Collaborative problem solving becomes non-collabor...
- How do you plead "commercial advertising or promot...
- When does "Zero trans fat" mean "just a little tra...
- Disparaging reference can't infringe as a matter o...
- "Sporty Car at a Great Value Price" may imply driv...
- The market for lemons/law schools
- Trouble brewing in coffee TM/advertising case
- Welcome to Scotland! (or somewhere else)
- Adobe crumbles: litigation mistakes allow reseller...
- Copyright hypo of the day
- Being an expert witness as commercial speech under...
- Filtered honey is honey despite Cal. law to the co...
- 6th Circuit finds "5 Hour Energy" suggestive for e...
- Some statements in press release aren't commercial...
- Falsity, historical fact, and who's qualified to f...
- That's where the light is
- Just who's being paternalist?
- What does "healthier" mean to consumers?
- Mathematically impossible claims aren't literally ...
- AU TM roundtable, part two
- AU TM roundtable, part one
- Allegedly copied infomercial can't support misappr...
- Cracked iPhone doesn't support consumer claims
- StubHub's guarantee doesn't guarantee tickets will...
- New review up
- What we see and what we don't
- Sharp dealers can deploy arbitration clauses too
- PLI briefing on Louboutin
- Can fandom change society?
- Unofficial Illiniwek shirts
- Today's Google doodle
- Standing in securities
- Ripped from the headlines
- Rewards card didn't need to disclose annual fee in...
- Buyer-approved substitution doesn't violate Lanham...
- Rounding up mobile minutes is mostly not actionable
- Ben & Jerry's sues Ben & Cherry's porn producer
- 9th Circuit vacates opinion condemning class actio...
- Second Circuit tries again on "use as a mark"
- Louboutin v. YSL released
- Adaptation
- Failure to disclose non-US origin not false despit...
- Plaintiff's longrunning uniqueness claims establis...
- my latest acquisition
- Browsewrap fails to bind customer to individual ar...
- Consumers can't sue for unfair practices in legal,...
- Initial interest confusion claim over keyword ads ...
- Lexmark v. Static Control: the false advertising y...
- House brands, a continuing series
- The NYT on unreliable reviews
-
▼
September
(56)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment