skip to main | skip to sidebar

Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log

False advertising and more

Saturday, July 14, 2012

Fair dealing as fair use?

Michael Geist takes up the question.
Posted by Rebecca Tushnet at 12:17 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: copyright

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Rebecca Tushnet

Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet

Email subscription

Get new posts by email:
Powered by follow.it

ABA Blawg 100

ABA Blawg 100

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn

  • Atom
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS 2.0
  • Use If This Than That (recommended but needs setup)

"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"

  • Harvard Law School
  • Mastodon (mostly repost of blog)
  • My website
  • Email me
  • Bluesky

Blog Archive

  • ►  2025 (98)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2024 (166)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (28)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2023 (243)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (26)
    • ►  March (32)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2022 (223)
    • ►  December (30)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (37)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2021 (260)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (41)
    • ►  September (86)
    • ►  August (69)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2020 (220)
    • ►  December (27)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (32)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2019 (289)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (37)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2018 (225)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (29)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2017 (334)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (48)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2016 (402)
    • ►  December (30)
    • ►  November (35)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (32)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (31)
    • ►  March (33)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2015 (446)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (37)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (37)
    • ►  June (38)
    • ►  May (40)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (44)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2014 (518)
    • ►  December (38)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (29)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (38)
    • ►  June (45)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (48)
    • ►  March (60)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (63)
  • ►  2013 (572)
    • ►  December (46)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ►  August (52)
    • ►  July (38)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (56)
    • ►  April (59)
    • ►  March (73)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (50)
  • ▼  2012 (598)
    • ►  December (56)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ►  September (56)
    • ►  August (53)
    • ▼  July (62)
      • Attempt to stop reality show with TM/publicity cla...
      • Review essay: The Knockoff Economy/There's No Free...
      • Does a purchaser of one flavor of ice cream have s...
      • Feature that doesn't work well can still be functi...
      • Law school fraud cases will go to discovery
      • Adding "the" and "company" makes generic term prot...
      • Abortion law or First Amendment law?
      • Slate on false claims by dietary supplements
      • What does it take to plead copyright infringement?
      • When marketing partnerships go wrong
      • Is the US First Amendment a model for other countr...
      • Advertising on Craigslist for a rubber stamp attorney
      • Heads I win, tails you lose
      • Causation/reliance interplay dooms condo false adv...
      • Weakness in evidence didn't make Nestle's "clinica...
      • Caveat student: lawsuit against Cooley law school ...
      • Watch me talk about fan fiction
      • The right hand doesn't know the left hand has DRM
      • How to lie with statistics: Netflix percentages no...
      • Alleging false marking with particularity: difficu...
      • Authentic fakes
      • Gripe site makes confusion unlikely, says court on...
      • Reading list: copyright and ratings
      • Copyright and disproportionate effects on images
      • Tasting the trademark, very rich guys edition
      • Best title of the year so far
      • So how did all those FDA surveillance documents ge...
      • 9th Circuit rejects settlement for wrong cy pres b...
      • some of it's made up, and some of it can't be quan...
      • Goldman & Tushnet on Advertising and Marketing Law
      • how standing cuts down class actions
      • Apparently false demonstration still not literally...
      • Priorities
      • Can your personal photo be reused for a political ad?
      • Fair dealing as fair use?
      • Plaintiff allegedly shut out of market lacks stand...
      • So, does Iraq have the right of publicity?
      • I got 99 problems but copyright ain't one?
      • Sci-fi children's books
      • Punny business names
      • Morality, business models, and music
      • Drug composition claims and expiration dates not l...
      • Slowness in Skype, http, etc. not enough to allege...
      • alleged violation of FDA regs on "healthy" allows ...
      • Patent noninfringement claims lead to falsity finding
      • Dastar doesn't bar claim that supplier switch conf...
      • Claim that 5-hour Energy misleads about source of ...
      • Taking credit for firm founders' prior work create...
      • Using content to sell technology
      • Great site, offensively dumb terms of use
      • Recent reading: copyright and uncertainty
      • Something I wondered about SocialCam before I bloc...
      • Quickly confessed error saves defendants from disg...
      • More effort required to plead around first sale th...
      • iPad customers' claims over termination of unlimit...
      • Drug studies as drug marketing
      • Claims of inflated hospital rates not actionable w...
      • Smartphone battery drain and disclosure of locatio...
      • Contradictory "amount owed" mortgage letters justi...
      • Fourth Circuit affirms invalidation of pregnancy c...
      • The Ninth Circuit shrugs; nonconsumer confusion ca...
      • Reprinting news article about competitor is commer...
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (45)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (430)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (40)
    • ►  October (39)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (59)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (40)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2010 (312)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (30)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (35)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2009 (392)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (45)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (43)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2008 (359)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2007 (380)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (38)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2006 (336)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (45)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2005 (50)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2004 (14)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2003 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)

Labels

  • 1201 (19)
  • 1202 (2)
  • 230 (96)
  • acpa (16)
  • advertising (283)
  • antitrust (49)
  • arbitration (3)
  • art law (36)
  • attribution (28)
  • b (1)
  • blogging (23)
  • california (538)
  • can-spam (1)
  • cfaa (12)
  • cfps (53)
  • class actions (278)
  • cmi (19)
  • comics (37)
  • commercial speech (273)
  • conferences (930)
  • consumer protection (977)
  • content moderation (3)
  • contracts (101)
  • copying (195)
  • copyright (1664)
  • counterfeiting (1)
  • creative commons (12)
  • cultural property (10)
  • cybersquatting (1)
  • damages (161)
  • dastar (197)
  • defamation (203)
  • derivative works (2)
  • design patent (57)
  • dilution (258)
  • disclosures (101)
  • disparagement (32)
  • dmca (203)
  • drm (72)
  • evidence (1)
  • false advertising (3147)
  • false association (13)
  • false designation of origin (8)
  • false endorsement (13)
  • fan fiction (87)
  • fanworks (190)
  • fda (277)
  • fees (35)
  • first amendment (445)
  • ftc (185)
  • g (1)
  • geographic indications (44)
  • go (1)
  • google (89)
  • insurance (73)
  • interviews (5)
  • jobs (2)
  • jurisdiction (5)
  • libraries (18)
  • misappropriation (10)
  • moral rights (18)
  • music (137)
  • my lawsuits (16)
  • my writings (114)
  • net neutrality (5)
  • parody (27)
  • patent (226)
  • patents (136)
  • peer production (27)
  • preclusion (1)
  • preemption (272)
  • presentations (119)
  • privacy (113)
  • procedure (146)
  • property (18)
  • reading list (311)
  • remedies (283)
  • right of publicity (267)
  • secondary liability (178)
  • securities (8)
  • standing (358)
  • surveys (113)
  • teaching (38)
  • tortious interference (116)
  • trade secrets (81)
  • trademark (2072)
  • traditional knowledge (11)
  • unconscionability (5)
  • unfairness (64)
  • warranties (14)

Things I've read

 

Creative Commons/disclaimer

Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights. I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.