skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log
False advertising and more
Tuesday, May 01, 2012
Columbia Journalism Review on campaigns' use of news footage
The story focuses on the political implications, with a nod to the copyright issues involved.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
ABA Blawg 100
Subscribe To
Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments
Subscribe via RSS
RSS 2.0
Atom
Follow by Email
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Harvard Law School
Twitter (repost of blog)
My website
Email me
Blog Archive
►
2021
(45)
►
July
(1)
►
June
(2)
►
May
(6)
►
April
(12)
►
March
(1)
►
February
(14)
►
January
(9)
►
2020
(220)
►
December
(27)
►
November
(8)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(26)
►
July
(12)
►
June
(17)
►
May
(15)
►
April
(13)
►
March
(19)
►
February
(20)
►
January
(14)
►
2019
(289)
►
December
(21)
►
November
(11)
►
October
(20)
►
September
(27)
►
August
(37)
►
July
(21)
►
June
(20)
►
May
(28)
►
April
(39)
►
March
(25)
►
February
(29)
►
January
(11)
►
2018
(225)
►
December
(14)
►
November
(17)
►
October
(12)
►
September
(16)
►
August
(26)
►
July
(12)
►
June
(18)
►
May
(22)
►
April
(29)
►
March
(19)
►
February
(27)
►
January
(13)
►
2017
(334)
►
December
(18)
►
November
(15)
►
October
(21)
►
September
(20)
►
August
(33)
►
July
(21)
►
June
(26)
►
May
(24)
►
April
(36)
►
March
(48)
►
February
(41)
►
January
(31)
►
2016
(402)
►
December
(30)
►
November
(35)
►
October
(35)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(34)
►
July
(22)
►
June
(39)
►
May
(49)
►
April
(31)
►
March
(33)
►
February
(35)
►
January
(27)
►
2015
(446)
►
December
(26)
►
November
(29)
►
October
(37)
►
September
(37)
►
August
(32)
►
July
(37)
►
June
(38)
►
May
(40)
►
April
(51)
►
March
(44)
►
February
(45)
►
January
(30)
►
2014
(518)
►
December
(38)
►
November
(25)
►
October
(29)
►
September
(48)
►
August
(47)
►
July
(38)
►
June
(45)
►
May
(32)
►
April
(48)
►
March
(60)
►
February
(45)
►
January
(63)
►
2013
(572)
►
December
(46)
►
November
(36)
►
October
(37)
►
September
(48)
►
August
(52)
►
July
(38)
►
June
(36)
►
May
(56)
►
April
(59)
►
March
(73)
►
February
(41)
►
January
(50)
▼
2012
(598)
►
December
(56)
►
November
(41)
►
October
(48)
►
September
(56)
►
August
(53)
►
July
(62)
►
June
(62)
▼
May
(69)
Minnesota S.Ct. rejects tobacco class action
eBay case involving pay-for-featured-status progra...
Amicus brief in Hart v. EA
High fructose corn syrup is still HFCS
Of possible interest to international IP types
Lifewater "all natural" claim not deceptive, other...
Delayed but long post on LV v. Hyundai
If a drug manufacturer pays the publication fee, i...
Not really a surprise: Pom disagrees with my readi...
"unlawful" conduct causes actionable harm even wit...
Clive Thompson on the importance of fan fiction an...
direct targeting of ads confers personal jurisdiction
What is the limitations/laches period for Lanham A...
Pom takes another pounding
Review: False Advertising and the Lanham Act
FTC ALJ rules many Pom ads misleading, unsubstanti...
public access to published federally funded research
False advertising case succeeds as TM claim
Hamlet in over 60 films
Brands, not trademarks?
Plain tobacco packaging at Georgetown
Georgia State and copyright ownership
Homeopathic products don't dilute plaintiffs' liti...
Brand dilution as a design patent theory of harm
My keen fashion sense: L'Oreal class action certified
This fruit snack is neither fruity nor snacky
Sarah Tran on Worth a Thousand Words
No publicity is bad publicity for Facebook plaintiff
Out of joint: supplement case survives motion to d...
Another reason to bring state-law claims: where th...
One good reason to plead coordinate state-law clai...
Vague allegations can't plead around first sale
Australian Dastar-type cases
What a difference a defense makes: court rejects C...
Touting unnecessary cancer treatment could be dece...
DMCA tech demonstration day
law v. norms, or why anticircumvention law doesn't...
"Paris shabby chic" not protectable trade dress
Sugar in the Raw not deceptively advertised as unp...
IP Small Claims Roundtable part 2
GW Roundtable on IP Small Claims
"from the designer of" not clearly nominative fair...
Undisclosed fees ok if total price disclosed and v...
INTA politics panel
INTA equates free with illegal, copyright with tra...
Recent reading: Chinese fan translations
The difference between seeking damages and injunct...
INTA: copyright law for trademark lawyers
Spy in the House of Trademark Maximalism: ambush m...
INTA: pharma panel and keyword panel
Class action spreads
Weak TM case won't justify fee award to defendants
Anticircumvention is weird and lacks attachment to...
INTA: outer limits and dilution
Another false marking defeat post AIA
Descriptiveness wasn't my first thought
Global family feud over allegedly stolen mark
Roflcon Keynote: Supercuts
Meme-literate law professor (insert punchline here)
5-Hour Energy and neverending litigation
Minimal call logs can't be used to infer widesprea...
False advertising and fandom collide
The secret non-sharer
Identical materials sent to over 1200 recipients n...
A word means what I say it means?
foot fault: overlapping TM and copyright claims in...
alleged privacy failures don't violate consumer pr...
Columbia Journalism Review on campaigns' use of ne...
Competitor's positive ads aren't disparaging for i...
►
April
(45)
►
March
(42)
►
February
(33)
►
January
(31)
►
2011
(430)
►
December
(35)
►
November
(40)
►
October
(39)
►
September
(41)
►
August
(59)
►
July
(36)
►
June
(25)
►
May
(36)
►
April
(40)
►
March
(31)
►
February
(17)
►
January
(31)
►
2010
(312)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(37)
►
October
(16)
►
September
(34)
►
August
(28)
►
July
(19)
►
June
(30)
►
May
(26)
►
April
(35)
►
March
(27)
►
February
(10)
►
January
(25)
►
2009
(392)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(45)
►
October
(42)
►
September
(23)
►
August
(43)
►
July
(39)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(28)
►
April
(37)
►
March
(39)
►
February
(22)
►
January
(27)
►
2008
(359)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(20)
►
October
(34)
►
September
(18)
►
August
(33)
►
July
(29)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(42)
►
April
(41)
►
March
(49)
►
February
(30)
►
January
(16)
►
2007
(380)
►
December
(22)
►
November
(38)
►
October
(50)
►
September
(34)
►
August
(39)
►
July
(32)
►
June
(29)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(23)
►
March
(30)
►
February
(40)
►
January
(23)
►
2006
(336)
►
December
(32)
►
November
(16)
►
October
(34)
►
September
(22)
►
August
(45)
►
July
(34)
►
June
(21)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(11)
►
March
(42)
►
February
(13)
►
January
(46)
►
2005
(50)
►
December
(13)
►
November
(14)
►
October
(1)
►
September
(2)
►
August
(3)
►
July
(2)
►
June
(6)
►
May
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(2)
►
February
(3)
►
January
(2)
►
2004
(14)
►
December
(3)
►
November
(9)
►
October
(2)
►
2003
(9)
►
December
(1)
►
November
(2)
►
October
(1)
►
September
(5)
Labels
1201
(15)
230
(87)
acpa
(15)
advertising
(274)
antitrust
(37)
arbitration
(2)
art law
(33)
attribution
(28)
b
(1)
blogging
(23)
california
(479)
can-spam
(1)
cfaa
(12)
cfps
(34)
class actions
(251)
cmi
(14)
comics
(37)
commercial speech
(235)
conferences
(836)
consumer protection
(689)
contracts
(91)
copying
(192)
copyright
(1535)
counterfeiting
(1)
creative commons
(12)
cultural property
(10)
cybersquatting
(1)
damages
(137)
dastar
(167)
defamation
(181)
derivative works
(2)
design patent
(48)
dilution
(250)
disclosures
(77)
disparagement
(21)
dmca
(192)
drm
(71)
evidence
(1)
false advertising
(2529)
fan fiction
(87)
fanworks
(190)
fda
(250)
fees
(31)
first amendment
(391)
ftc
(168)
g
(1)
geographic indications
(35)
go
(1)
google
(88)
insurance
(63)
interviews
(5)
jobs
(2)
jurisdiction
(5)
libraries
(18)
misappropriation
(10)
moral rights
(16)
music
(130)
my lawsuits
(16)
my writings
(99)
net neutrality
(5)
parody
(27)
patent
(203)
patents
(131)
peer production
(27)
preemption
(243)
presentations
(109)
privacy
(106)
procedure
(143)
property
(17)
reading list
(293)
remedies
(212)
right of publicity
(233)
secondary liability
(160)
securities
(7)
standing
(305)
surveys
(73)
teaching
(28)
tortious interference
(96)
trade secrets
(74)
trademark
(1818)
traditional knowledge
(9)
unconscionability
(5)
unfairness
(54)
warranties
(12)
Things I've read
My Library
at
LibraryThing
Ad Links
FTC Business Center Blog
ABA's Private Advertising Litigation Committee
All About Ad Law (Venable)
Consumer Advertising Law Blog (Arnold & Porter)
Consumer Law & Policy Blog (Public Citizen)
E-Commerce & Tech Law Blog
The Commercial Closet
The Language of Advertising
Copyright Links
Books Online: No US Access
Columbia Law Library Music Plagiarism Archive
Copyright Litigation Blog
Copyright Termination Calculator
Current Copyright Legal Literature
Fairly Used: Stanford Fair Use Project
Illegal Art exhibit
Jessica Litman's Copyright Links
Keep Your Copyrights (Columbia U.)
Larry Lessig on Free Culture
Madisonian.net
Owners, Borrowers and Thieves
Political Remix Video
Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900)
Respect Copyrights (movie industry site)
The HP Lovecraft Library
Useful Arts.us
Trademark Links
Beauty Marks (Jessica Stone Levy)
Counterfeit Chic
Current Trademark Legal Literature
ICANN: Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
Jessica Litman's Trademark Links
Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
Pattishall IP blog
Search UDRP Decisions
Seattle Trademark Lawyer
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
The Trademark Blog
The TTABlog
UDRPLaw Net
Other Links
xkcd
Rothman's Roadmap to the Right of Publicity
Balkinization
CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act) Law Blog
Confessions of an Aca/Fan: Henry Jenkins
Feminist Law Professors
History of Animation in Court
Jotwell: Journal of Things We Like Lots
Michigan Telecom & Tech Law Review blog
Online Fandom
Post or Perish (Online media legal issues)
PropertyProf Blog
Rocket Docket (EDVa IP Litigation)
The Gray Blog (parallel imports)
No comments:
Post a Comment