Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Lexmark post-argument panel at AU

American University Washington College of Law 
Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property 
Supreme Court Series:
Lexmark International, Inc. v. 
Static Control Components, Inc.
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
4:00pm - 5:30pm
Reception to follow
Room 603
American University, Washington College of Law
4801 Massachusetts Ave NW Washington DC 20016 
For Registration, CLE info & Webcast (live and archived):

Issue: Whether the appropriate analytic framework for determining a party's standing to maintain an action for false advertising under the Lanham Act is (1) the factors set forth in Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters as adopted by the Third, Fifth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits; (2) the categorical test, permitting suits only by an actual competitor, employed by the Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits; or (3) a version of the more expansive "reasonable interest" test, either as applied by the Sixth Circuit in the case or as applied by the Second Circuit in prior cases.
Steven B. Loy - Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, representing Lexmark
Seth Greenstein - Constantine Cannon LLC, representing Static Control Components, Inc.
Rebecca Tushnet - Georgetown University Law Center, representing amicus curiae, Law Professors
Marc A. Goldman - Jenner & Block LLP, representing amicus curiae American Intellectual Property Association
Mary Massaron Ross - Immediate Past President of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar, representing amicus curiae, DRI
Moderated by: Christine Farley - American University Washington College of Law

No comments:

Post a Comment