With Jennifer Urban, Erik Stallman, and Pam Samuelson, I'm happy to have worked on this amicus brief discussing the text, history, and structure of 1202.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2025
(173)
-
▼
July
(22)
- I write letters
- 9th Circuit affirms class status based on material...
- court finds advertising injury insurance coverage ...
- amicus in Prevagen v. FTC appeal
- alleged use of competitor's corporate "persona" di...
- no initial interest confusion from a deactivated p...
- XL BBL and Petite BBL are generic for what you thi...
- AI voice cloning opinion narrows claims to ROP, re...
- Amicus brief on CMI removal in Doe v. Github
- even if it's not a security, a stablecoin can trig...
- California's Made in the USA safe harbors aren't p...
- New book chapter on advertising, TM, and antitrust
- P&G's brand extension ZzzQuil must face lawsuit al...
- GIs can be indications of quality for purposes of ...
- breast pump rules: Think Green's trade dress claim...
- ambiguity in consumer class actions v. the Lanham ...
- Southern discomfort: class certified over malt bev...
- 5th Circuit agrees that joint TM owners can't sue ...
- claim of failure to warn of kratom's addiction pot...
- plaintiffs don't have to use full FDA methods for ...
- Scotts loses trade dress claim over green & gold f...
- "local" can be literally false when a company is f...
-
▼
July
(22)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (3)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (284)
- antitrust (50)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (539)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (53)
- class actions (280)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (276)
- conferences (939)
- consumer protection (1001)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (102)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1680)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (165)
- dastar (198)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (262)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (32)
- dmca (204)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3200)
- false association (18)
- false designation of origin (8)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (282)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (452)
- ftc (186)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (44)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (75)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (139)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (117)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (230)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (2)
- preemption (275)
- presentations (121)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (148)
- property (18)
- reading list (313)
- remedies (287)
- right of publicity (271)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (360)
- surveys (113)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (117)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2096)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment