Yum. "A shortbread cookie topped with a layer of caramel, a layer of chocolate ganache, dipped in dark chocolate and drizzled with white chocolate."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2021
(260)
-
▼
October
(41)
- facially plausible false advertising claim can be ...
- Lanham Act willfulness satisfies Bankruptcy Act wi...
- Seen in NYC: the Twix bar that isn't.
- Timeshare case: proof of causation/damages is diff...
- Court rejects "buy button" false advertising claim...
- Puzzlingly calling a venue name a "title," court n...
- "virologist developed" etc. plausibly implies dise...
- Tiffany blues
- Trump loses motion to dismiss Electric Avenue case...
- over dissent, 9th Cir. denies injury presumption t...
- if it's on the label, courts can presume consumers...
- defendant moots claim by ending activity in a way ...
- challenging defendant's clinical proof claim is fa...
- counting chickens: should disgorgement be harder f...
- Juxtaposition doesn't necessarily mean one claim b...
- disparagement campaign in niche jewelry market cou...
- Mexican origin claims revitalized by survey
- Disney's Toy Story 4 daredevil not legally risky
- non-toxic plausibly means nonharmful, but harmfuln...
- NY can still seek disgorgement even if FTC can't
- Bad reviews as evidence of actual knowledge of def...
- Ice Cube's case against Robinhood melts again
- grudge litigation over warranties with no harm lea...
- competitor succeeds in enjoining sale of competing...
- survey evidence disregarded in another vanilla case
- False endorsement remains broader than many state ...
- accusing a home inspectors' group of link with NAM...
- no cognizable harm where statutorily required info...
- false advertising claim fails, in part because of ...
- "advertising injury" insurance exclusion doesn't e...
- No organizational standing from mere conflict with...
- consumer's bid to enjoin Redbubble's sale of "coun...
- Another pharma substitution case fails
- Laches bars TM claims but what counts as "Made in ...
- Dastar prevents misrepresentation of source of IP ...
- Dastar doesn't bar allegedly false advertising abo...
- USC IP year in review, TM/ROP
- emails to 12 customers weren't commercial advertis...
- maintaining outdated article on website about form...
- "Krab mix" plausibly misleads as to crab content
- Reading list: The Powerpoint Channel
-
▼
October
(41)
Labels
- 1201 (18)
- 1202 (1)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (281)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (534)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (46)
- class actions (276)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (266)
- conferences (910)
- consumer protection (920)
- content moderation (2)
- contracts (99)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1635)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (156)
- dastar (189)
- defamation (200)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (56)
- dilution (256)
- disclosures (94)
- disparagement (28)
- dmca (201)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3023)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (4)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (435)
- ftc (182)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (111)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (222)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (263)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (144)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (269)
- right of publicity (260)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (352)
- surveys (100)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (112)
- trade secrets (80)
- trademark (2015)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (61)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment