Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(402)
-
▼
September
(32)
- Right of publicity/passing off blast from the past
- when are state law unfair competition claims preem...
- Parody product fails to squeak through the cracks ...
- Texas and 3 other states sue to block ICANN transi...
- Ad featuring old, mild citations against health fa...
- Conversation on fan films and copyright, part 2
- Transformative work of the day
- It's false advertising, Charlie Brown!
- Star Trek, fan films and transformative use
- Advertiser's self-voting on positive reviews as "h...
- Speech in study would be commercial if knowingly f...
- FTC wins second appellate victory over 230 defense
- 43(a) question of the day
- Advertising question of the day
- "unique" and "innovative" are puffery
- How does race affect copyrightable expression?
- Packaging trade dress needs specific design, not j...
- Using photos of competitor's product confers statu...
- Celebrity spokesperson isn't directly liable under...
- No duty to disclose child labor production in Cali...
- New review in Jotwell: Nestor M. Davidson & John J...
- Taking advantage of known consumer ignorance is de...
- Plumb disappointing: 9th Circuit reinstates 2D-to-...
- Another court finds that injury from fake "sale" p...
- Stanford Sociology and Psychology of IP
- Stanford Sociology & Psychology of IP, branding
- Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What ca...
- The Psychology and Sociology of IP, patents
- The Psychology and Sociology of Creativity and IP,...
- "same active ingredient" claim is false when P's p...
- NY law offers more than 43(a) when it comes to all...
- If a body catch a body in high heels
-
▼
September
(32)
Labels
- 1201 (18)
- 1202 (1)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (281)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (534)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (46)
- class actions (276)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (266)
- conferences (910)
- consumer protection (920)
- content moderation (2)
- contracts (99)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1635)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (156)
- dastar (189)
- defamation (200)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (56)
- dilution (256)
- disclosures (94)
- disparagement (28)
- dmca (201)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3023)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (4)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (435)
- ftc (182)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (111)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (222)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (263)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (144)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (269)
- right of publicity (260)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (352)
- surveys (100)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (112)
- trade secrets (80)
- trademark (2015)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (61)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment