Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(402)
-
▼
September
(32)
- Right of publicity/passing off blast from the past
- when are state law unfair competition claims preem...
- Parody product fails to squeak through the cracks ...
- Texas and 3 other states sue to block ICANN transi...
- Ad featuring old, mild citations against health fa...
- Conversation on fan films and copyright, part 2
- Transformative work of the day
- It's false advertising, Charlie Brown!
- Star Trek, fan films and transformative use
- Advertiser's self-voting on positive reviews as "h...
- Speech in study would be commercial if knowingly f...
- FTC wins second appellate victory over 230 defense
- 43(a) question of the day
- Advertising question of the day
- "unique" and "innovative" are puffery
- How does race affect copyrightable expression?
- Packaging trade dress needs specific design, not j...
- Using photos of competitor's product confers statu...
- Celebrity spokesperson isn't directly liable under...
- No duty to disclose child labor production in Cali...
- New review in Jotwell: Nestor M. Davidson & John J...
- Taking advantage of known consumer ignorance is de...
- Plumb disappointing: 9th Circuit reinstates 2D-to-...
- Another court finds that injury from fake "sale" p...
- Stanford Sociology and Psychology of IP
- Stanford Sociology & Psychology of IP, branding
- Sociology and Psychology of IP, Session 3: What ca...
- The Psychology and Sociology of IP, patents
- The Psychology and Sociology of Creativity and IP,...
- "same active ingredient" claim is false when P's p...
- NY law offers more than 43(a) when it comes to all...
- If a body catch a body in high heels
-
▼
September
(32)
Labels
- 1201 (16)
- 230 (94)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (280)
- antitrust (47)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (34)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (531)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (43)
- class actions (267)
- cmi (18)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (260)
- conferences (883)
- consumer protection (863)
- contracts (96)
- copying (193)
- copyright (1603)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (148)
- dastar (183)
- defamation (192)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (54)
- dilution (255)
- disclosures (89)
- disparagement (27)
- dmca (199)
- drm (71)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (2903)
- false association (9)
- false designation of origin (2)
- false endorsement (12)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (271)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (422)
- ftc (177)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (42)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (69)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (132)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (105)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (214)
- patents (133)
- peer production (27)
- preemption (261)
- presentations (116)
- privacy (111)
- procedure (144)
- property (17)
- reading list (301)
- remedies (260)
- right of publicity (252)
- secondary liability (176)
- securities (8)
- standing (338)
- surveys (93)
- teaching (37)
- tortious interference (109)
- trade secrets (77)
- trademark (1961)
- traditional knowledge (10)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (60)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment