Canada, like many other countries, considers "taking unfair advantage" of a trademark to be a distinct problem, making it less favorable to parody and other uses than the U.S. as a matter of formal law. What difference does that make in practice? From what I've seen, it means that grocery stores/pharmacies don't carry house brands that tell you they're comparable to national brands. However, it doesn't seem to affect the T-shirt offerings of tourist traps. (Side note: there was also more overt misogyny on offer than I would have expected. Really, Canada?)
 |
Not quite Rolls Royce |
 |
One of many John Deere alternatives--Canada also uses "fuck" more liberally at standard tourist stores |
 |
MasterCard and Red Bull, sexualized |
 |
Red Moose/Red Bull and Star Wars |
 |
John Moose instead of John Deere; Star Wars again; and what do we think of the Montreal logo v. Adidas? This one was everywhere |
 |
Mountain Dude |
 |
This one is more consumer/contract law: "no contract" is also a thing in Canada; I wonder what the law is about that |
 |
Right of publicity claim for the Michael Jackson estate? |
 |
Snoop Dogg or just a dog? |
 |
Lady PurrPurr? |
 |
Queen size? |
 |
A little tramp? |
 |
Too close to Superman? |
 |
An entire province devoted to Pokemon |
 |
Pizza Pot, Zig-Zag, Addicted, Kick Ass, Fuma |
 |
National Pornographic, another John Fucking Deere, sex-based "I'm Lovin' It" and some of the aforementioned misogyny |
 |
Lord of the Rinks |
 |
Straight Outta Quebec |
 |
Starbear logo? |
 |
iTunes trade dress |
 |
Canada, Coke style |
 |
Angry Moose |
 |
Angry Beaver |
1 comment:
I think you will find a HUGE variation on misogyny and the use of "fuck" between provinces. Quebec culture is quite distinct in many ways - and I'm not putting a quality/qualifier judgment on that.
Post a Comment