Hamilton/Star Wars crossover: what IP rights, if any, are implicated? Does it matter whether the ad copy mentions Hamilton?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(402)
-
▼
August
(34)
- More Canadian IP pictures
- both sides do it: court in Trump Univ. case resolv...
- Little Tree, big TM claim
- Trader Joe's can go after Canadian reseller in US ...
- laches period won't run before false advertising c...
- NY false advertising law lacks rigid false/mislead...
- Pictures from Canada
- Inconceivable: allegedly made-up price comparison ...
- Cthulhu the functional?
- Fashion weak: fashion show fails to enjoin New Yor...
- Cookie crumbles: court refuses to dismiss (c) clai...
- 6th Circuit rejects college players' Lanham Act, R...
- ISP fails to dismiss (c) and CMI claims based on w...
- Amicus in LV v. My Other Bag
- Reading list: Rothman on (c)/right of publicity co...
- CustomMade doesn't know about USOC's anti-free-spe...
- Trump hotel fails in suit against unionizers
- Burr Shot First
- Cheerios Protein name might be more bluff than buff
- IPSC: Closing Plenary Session
- IPSC Breakout Session IV
- IPSC Breakout Session III
- IPSC Breakout Session V
- IPSC breakout session II
- IPSC Breakout Session I
- IPSC First Plenary Session
- failure to speak can be advertising but not presen...
- Confusion bans are content-based so disclaimers mu...
- Strict liability means competitor can create liter...
- Annemarie Bridy takes on the Copyright Office's ov...
- Can functionality become nonfunctionality with new...
- Dirty Dancing remake: court grants reconsideration...
- Transformative use of the day?
- Seen at the amusement park: TM question of the day
-
▼
August
(34)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment