Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(446)
-
▼
December
(26)
- Prior use can't be determined on motion to dismiss...
- Bait and switch on different versions of the same ...
- Selfie restraint: It's hard to show fame and irrep...
- UK ASA doesn't think "in association with" is enou...
- Reading list: are Facebook likes true endorsements?
- one note on In re Tam: TM as right to suppress oth...
- Update: SanMedica v. Amazon favorably settles
- Transformative work of the day, Star Wars edition
- A dreaded sunny day for Abbott & Costello heirs: p...
- Reading list: Lanham Act standing after Lexmark
- Defendant can't take advantage of TM abandonment i...
- Puerto Rico registration can't constitutionally ex...
- California false advertising requires "advertising...
- Transformative work of the day, Omelas edition
- Soliciting lawsuits against TM owner isn't confusi...
- Reading list: Redskins as insult and brand
- Reading list: empirically testing tarnishment of m...
- 6th Circuit holds that targeted ads are commercial...
- California claims against false use of "organic" n...
- is "this video has been removed for violating the ...
- Court mashes up Dastar and commercial speech doctr...
- Reading list: commercializing fanworks in the US a...
- EU public consultation on intermediary liability
- Amicus brief in visual meme case
- Amicus brief in karaoke case: Dastar revisited
- Metaphor likening plaintiff to peeping Tom is opin...
-
▼
December
(26)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment