Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(446)
-
▼
July
(37)
- No silver bullet for innovator in bullion market
- Amicus supporting rehearing in MTM v. Amazon
- Limiting remedies when a descriptive fair use defe...
- Transformative use of the day, Lululemon edition
- Somehow the Coke bottle survived this dilutive fre...
- 4th Circuit denies rehearing in In re GNC
- ISHTIP at Penn, part 9
- ISHTIP at Penn, part 8
- ISHTIP at Penn, Part 7
- ISHTIP at Penn, part 6
- Washington Post explains how the DMCA will kill yo...
- ISHTIP at Penn, Part 5
- ISHTIP at Penn, part 4
- Claims about computer expertise aren't puffery to ...
- ISHTIP at Penn, part 3
- ISHTIP at Penn, part 2
- ISHTIP at Penn, part 1
- Uber's safety claims not all puffery
- BBB claims about its own ratings process not prote...
- First Circuit lifts injunction requiring D's use o...
- Transformative work of the day, Miss Piggy edition
- What claims work when D allegedly drives P down in...
- New fair use app from New Media Rights
- Transformative work of the day, Bryan Adams edition
- CD Cal rejects In re GNC for all the right reasons
- False establishment claims not actionable under co...
- Dastar-barred claims can't be repled as false adve...
- Is it awful of me to want a Downfall remix featuri...
- Quote of the day: on trademark harm
- Amicus seeking rehearing in In re GNC
- And his fate is still unlearn’d: Subway overcharge...
- A rant on the Copyright Office's Orphan Works prop...
- Reading list: Christine Jolls on visual disclosures
- Exaggerated and outdated photos literally false, c...
- Venable on notable NAD product name ruling
- Clearblue's pregnancy test gets the blues: recall ...
- UK ad regulator disapproves of negative puffery
-
▼
July
(37)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment