Donna Davies’ Fanarchy, a documentary for which I was
interviewed on the law relating to fanworks, will be making its US television
debut on EPIX, Thursday, July 9 at 8 pm ET.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(446)
-
▼
June
(38)
- Trademark scholars roundtable: the consumer in dif...
- DMCA exemption followup
- Fourth Circuit destroys literal falsity
- Trademark scholars roundtable: establishing the fe...
- Trademark scholars roundtable: roles for the consu...
- Ninth Circuit rejects class certification because ...
- claim of "improved" version of competitor's produc...
- False patent marking isn't material to business cu...
- London TM finds, food edition
- it's illegal to say that use of non-manufacturer a...
- London visit, TM and cultural property edition
- visiting London: TM edition
- Fandom documentary: coming July 9
- Reading list: advertising atypical results
- Next! Bonded leather maker loses false advertising...
- Thought for (pet) food: false advertising claims c...
- Court throws shade on TM claimant's naked licensing
- All that is solid melts into air: photog loses cla...
- Amicus brief in Slep-Tone about scope of Dastar
- Amicus brief in TVEyes fair use case
- False patent marking not actionable under Lanham Act
- “How can the academy best contribute to IP policy?”
- What Is the Academy’s Role in Evidence-based Polic...
- Apples-to-oranges comparison is literally false, j...
- Seventh Circuit engages in target practice on desc...
- Copyrighting appropriation art?
- In which I sue the government
- Native American Arts lacks standing to sue under IACA
- Court certifies class against JCPenney for alleged...
- Who's honoring me now? (Public Knowledge)
- Student athletes lose another right of publicity c...
- violation of labeling law is presumptively materia...
- Plaintiff is over a barrel without a protectable t...
- Ron Coleman reviews Keller & Cunard copyright trea...
- DMCA Class 21 (vehicle software) FYI
- failure to show damage from accusation of falsity ...
- "designed to meet standard" doesn't mean "meets st...
- Can you patent the Barbra Streisand effect?
-
▼
June
(38)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment