skip to main | skip to sidebar

Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log

False advertising and more

Tuesday, June 02, 2015

Can you patent the Barbra Streisand effect?

Lawyer sues EFF over its stupid patent of the month award.
Posted by Rebecca Tushnet at 5:52 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: defamation, first amendment, patents

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Rebecca Tushnet

Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet

Email subscription

Subscribe

* indicates required

ABA Blawg 100

ABA Blawg 100

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn

  • Atom
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS 2.0
  • Use If This Than That (recommended but needs setup)

"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"

  • Harvard Law School
  • Mastodon (mostly repost of blog)
  • Twitter (repost of blog)
  • My website
  • Email me

Blog Archive

  • ►  2023 (234)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (13)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (16)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (26)
    • ►  March (32)
    • ►  February (24)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2022 (223)
    • ►  December (30)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (37)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2021 (260)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (41)
    • ►  September (86)
    • ►  August (69)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2020 (220)
    • ►  December (27)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (32)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2019 (289)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (37)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2018 (225)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (29)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2017 (334)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (48)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2016 (402)
    • ►  December (30)
    • ►  November (35)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (32)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (31)
    • ►  March (33)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ▼  2015 (446)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (37)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (37)
    • ▼  June (38)
      • Trademark scholars roundtable: the consumer in dif...
      • DMCA exemption followup
      • Fourth Circuit destroys literal falsity
      • Trademark scholars roundtable: establishing the fe...
      • Trademark scholars roundtable: roles for the consu...
      • Ninth Circuit rejects class certification because ...
      • claim of "improved" version of competitor's produc...
      • False patent marking isn't material to business cu...
      • London TM finds, food edition
      • it's illegal to say that use of non-manufacturer a...
      • London visit, TM and cultural property edition
      • visiting London: TM edition
      • Fandom documentary: coming July 9
      • Reading list: advertising atypical results
      • Next! Bonded leather maker loses false advertising...
      • Thought for (pet) food: false advertising claims c...
      • Court throws shade on TM claimant's naked licensing
      • All that is solid melts into air: photog loses cla...
      • Amicus brief in Slep-Tone about scope of Dastar
      • Amicus brief in TVEyes fair use case
      • False patent marking not actionable under Lanham Act
      • “How can the academy best contribute to IP policy?”
      • What Is the Academy’s Role in Evidence-based Polic...
      • Apples-to-oranges comparison is literally false, j...
      • Seventh Circuit engages in target practice on desc...
      • Copyrighting appropriation art?
      • In which I sue the government
      • Native American Arts lacks standing to sue under IACA
      • Court certifies class against JCPenney for alleged...
      • Who's honoring me now? (Public Knowledge)
      • Student athletes lose another right of publicity c...
      • violation of labeling law is presumptively materia...
      • Plaintiff is over a barrel without a protectable t...
      • Ron Coleman reviews Keller & Cunard copyright trea...
      • DMCA Class 21 (vehicle software) FYI
      • failure to show damage from accusation of falsity ...
      • "designed to meet standard" doesn't mean "meets st...
      • Can you patent the Barbra Streisand effect?
    • ►  May (40)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (44)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2014 (518)
    • ►  December (38)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (29)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (38)
    • ►  June (45)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (48)
    • ►  March (60)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (63)
  • ►  2013 (572)
    • ►  December (46)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ►  August (52)
    • ►  July (38)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (56)
    • ►  April (59)
    • ►  March (73)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (50)
  • ►  2012 (598)
    • ►  December (56)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ►  September (56)
    • ►  August (53)
    • ►  July (62)
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (45)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (430)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (40)
    • ►  October (39)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (59)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (40)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2010 (312)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (30)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (35)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2009 (392)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (45)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (43)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2008 (359)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2007 (380)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (38)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2006 (336)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (45)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2005 (50)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2004 (14)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2003 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)

Labels

  • 1201 (17)
  • 230 (96)
  • acpa (16)
  • advertising (281)
  • antitrust (47)
  • arbitration (3)
  • art law (36)
  • attribution (28)
  • b (1)
  • blogging (23)
  • california (533)
  • can-spam (1)
  • cfaa (12)
  • cfps (43)
  • class actions (272)
  • cmi (19)
  • comics (37)
  • commercial speech (264)
  • conferences (898)
  • consumer protection (894)
  • contracts (98)
  • copying (194)
  • copyright (1623)
  • counterfeiting (1)
  • creative commons (12)
  • cultural property (10)
  • cybersquatting (1)
  • damages (152)
  • dastar (188)
  • defamation (197)
  • derivative works (2)
  • design patent (55)
  • dilution (256)
  • disclosures (93)
  • disparagement (28)
  • dmca (200)
  • drm (71)
  • evidence (1)
  • false advertising (2972)
  • false association (11)
  • false designation of origin (4)
  • false endorsement (12)
  • fan fiction (87)
  • fanworks (190)
  • fda (271)
  • fees (35)
  • first amendment (431)
  • ftc (181)
  • g (1)
  • geographic indications (43)
  • go (1)
  • google (89)
  • insurance (71)
  • interviews (5)
  • jobs (2)
  • jurisdiction (5)
  • libraries (18)
  • misappropriation (10)
  • moral rights (18)
  • music (134)
  • my lawsuits (16)
  • my writings (107)
  • net neutrality (5)
  • parody (27)
  • patent (219)
  • patents (136)
  • peer production (27)
  • preemption (262)
  • presentations (117)
  • privacy (112)
  • procedure (144)
  • property (18)
  • reading list (303)
  • remedies (264)
  • right of publicity (256)
  • secondary liability (178)
  • securities (8)
  • standing (348)
  • surveys (96)
  • teaching (37)
  • tortious interference (111)
  • trade secrets (79)
  • trademark (1988)
  • traditional knowledge (10)
  • unconscionability (5)
  • unfairness (61)
  • warranties (14)

Things I've read

 

Creative Commons/disclaimer

Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights. I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.