Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2015
(446)
-
▼
January
(30)
- Trademark overreach of the day: ICE says "Yankees ...
- Dastar-barred claim survives both as false adverti...
- DC rejects POM's FTC challenge
- false advertising claim based on "innovative/uniqu...
- consumer survey on patent value admissible despite...
- False PAC advertising?
- Distributor's TM registration blocks manufacturer'...
- No standing for injunction-only class
- Mapping the law prof twitterverse
- Transformative use of the day: Washington's footba...
- Q of the day: is this enough disclosure?
- Dial U for unfair competition?
- Pinterest, sponsorship, and copyright
- Lexmark applies to false association, not just fal...
- Interpretation of alleged relabeling agreement is ...
- Passing off claim is subject to Rule 9(b) but passes
- Pop quiz, hotshot
- Art objects and trademark infringement
- Transformative work of the day
- Reading list: cheap books and scientific progress
- Lost goodwill isn't irreparable harm without compr...
- Book chapter on resisting gendered concepts of cre...
- False endorsement analyzed as explicit v. implicit...
- Reading list: copyrightability of plastination
- claims about patent might be misleading if on-sale...
- Affiliates are advertiser's agents
- statements by competitors are not matters of publi...
- Is "following" on Twitter endorsement?
- I'm stuck on Choc-Aid
- Accusation of "instability" actionable but use of ...
-
▼
January
(30)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
3 comments:
My next expert witness: Sir Mashalot!
Fascinating! Thank you.
Agreed! As a (sometimes) country fan I can't believe I didn't pick up on this.
Post a Comment