Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(518)
-
▼
October
(29)
- The nominative/descriptive line
- FTC challenges Gerber allergy-protection claims in...
- Can't replead TM as false advertising when functio...
- Just in time for Halloween: this should make TM ow...
- Case against allegedly contaminated jerky treats p...
- Whole Foods' not wholly natural foods are ok
- TM, advertising claims excluded from LivingSocial'...
- Which false advertising claims are barred by Dastar?
- Empirical IP Research Conference: copyright
- Empirical IP Research Conference: TM counterfeiting
- Empirical IP Research Conference: trademarks
- Empirical IP Research Conference, NYU
- Organization for Transformative Works fundraising ...
- likely confusion is irreparable after eBay
- The highs are too high: overdraft claims against H...
- Pleading standards for false advertising
- NFL Films protected by First Amendment against pla...
- AU trademark works in progress day 2
- AU TM works in progress part 2
- Preclusion lives even after Pom Wonderful
- 3rd Annual Trademark Works in Progress event at AU
- Court declines to apply Lexmark to TM
- Future of Music conference announcement w/scholars...
- How to analyze fame on the pleadings
- The language of consumer reviews
- Phantom trademark of the Opera: Dastar bars Slep-T...
- CFP: INTA trademark scholarship symposium
- statements to regulators aren't commercial adverti...
- EFF investigates keylogger software, finds false a...
-
▼
October
(29)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (50)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (539)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (53)
- class actions (278)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (273)
- conferences (930)
- consumer protection (979)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (101)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1664)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (161)
- dastar (197)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (258)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (32)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3150)
- false association (13)
- false designation of origin (8)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (277)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (445)
- ftc (185)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (44)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (73)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (137)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (115)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (226)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (272)
- presentations (119)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (146)
- property (18)
- reading list (311)
- remedies (283)
- right of publicity (267)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (358)
- surveys (113)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2073)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment