Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
October
(37)
- Delay notifying insurer until after $13.5 million ...
- Georgetown Law Journal technology symposium, Nov. 8
- Transformative work of the year
- 9th Circuit requires arbitration for consumer prot...
- Class ascertainability exists without purchase rec...
- "All Natural" too undefined to be the basis of a c...
- Singaporean bank finds no relief from Lanham Act
- Student-athletes' right of publicity claims can gr...
- First Amendment bars Lanham Act claim against univ...
- Versace embraces counterfeit style
- Reading list: empirical study of fertility clinic ...
- AAI amicus in Lexmark
- belated defense of law reviews
- INTA's brief in Lexmark
- When is a sale not a sale?
- law barring "surcharge for credit" signs unconstit...
- photos can be false by necessary implication
- Transformative work of the day
- Static Control's brief in Lexmark
- Lanham Act and ACPA damages not dischargeable in b...
- Software update defeats class certification
- Willful false advertising insufficient to justify ...
- Failure to allege agency relationship leads to fee...
- Trademarks as celebrities?
- The milk of human lawsuits
- sugar by any other name unlawful, but not misleading
- Samsung made a vid (sort of) as an ad
- "unlimited" service that was actually limited coul...
- mere lack of substantiation isn't actionable by co...
- another evaporated cane juice plaintiff gets to pr...
- This NYT story on mugshot removal has it all
- You know a survey's been done badly
- The political economy of zombies
- New treatise on fashion law
- Organization for Transformative Works: fundraising...
- Newton law: puree is real fruit
- Organization for Transformative Works seeks volunt...
-
▼
October
(37)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment