Law professors' brief (which reflects my views).
AIPLA's brief.
Brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
August
(52)
- "always lit" not plausibly material for Christmas ...
- Can "all natural" food be bioengineered?
- Enzyte at Slate
- Topside amicus briefs in Lexmark v. Static Controls
- Another court adopts Cariou
- Defamation suit against BBB survives anti-SLAPP mo...
- Standard trademark claim, ill-fitting nominative u...
- pharmaceutical equivalence case fails, including w...
- Transformative work of the day, infomercial edition
- Portland sues for infringement of functional publi...
- Today's transformative work
- authorization to use complaint is irrevocable, pre...
- if product is objectively worse than promised, con...
- Hangman copyright and TM claim escapes executioner...
- Snowball fight, part X
- unclean hands destroys false advertising damages a...
- advertisers couldn't go after publisher for compet...
- Welcome to Night Vale
- Lexmark v. Static Controls: Lexmark's merits brief
- Standing not enough for grab bag of food allegations
- Don't call every attack on legal sufficiency a sta...
- Limitations period bars Lanham Act claim even with...
- Puffery with a price: 9th circuit affirms dismissa...
- failure to communicate with borrower causes cogniz...
- Siri, does this complaint state a claim?
- The IP attorney Tumblr
- On fine print
- Changed meaning is fair use, but can't justify fee...
- disguising antitrust violations with false public ...
- Product placement gone very wrong
- IPSC, Second Plenary Session: Clinical Perspective...
- IPSC, day two, breakout session 4: long presentations
- IPSC day 2, session 3, long presentations
- IPSC, day 2 session 2, short presentations
- IPSC Day Two, long presentation session 1: trademark
- IPSC breakout 4, long presentations: design patents
- IPSC breakout 3: short presentations/copyright
- IPSC: long presentation session 1
- IPSC breakout one: short papers
- IPSC 2013, Cardozo, First Plenary Session
- Comparative ad creates personal jurisdiction in ta...
- image of P's product on D's site was insufficient ...
- Kindle Worlds, destroyer of lifeworlds?
- Keller v. EA: visual elements mean game isn't prot...
- Multiproduct California class certified in natural...
- The First Amendment in play: Brown v. EA
- Reading list: consumer protection
- copying articles for patent prosecution is fair use
- Australian parliament: Australians should circumve...
- reliance on general employment statistics unreason...
- I sense a disturbance in the Force
- Claim against Hotwire for underestimating rental c...
-
▼
August
(52)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment