skip to main | skip to sidebar

Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log

False advertising and more

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Topside amicus briefs in Lexmark v. Static Controls

Law professors' brief (which reflects my views).

AIPLA's brief.

Brief of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar.
Posted by Rebecca Tushnet at 9:28 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: false advertising, standing

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Rebecca Tushnet

Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet

ABA Blawg 100

ABA Blawg 100

Subscribe To

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Subscribe via RSS

  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom

"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"

  • Harvard Law School
  • Twitter (repost of blog)
  • My website
  • Email me

Blog Archive

  • ►  2022 (126)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (20)
    • ►  February (37)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2021 (260)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (41)
    • ►  September (86)
    • ►  August (69)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (12)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2020 (220)
    • ►  December (27)
    • ►  November (8)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (32)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (17)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2019 (289)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (37)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (39)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (29)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2018 (225)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (12)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (18)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (29)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (27)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2017 (334)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (15)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (36)
    • ►  March (48)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2016 (402)
    • ►  December (30)
    • ►  November (35)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (32)
    • ►  August (34)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (39)
    • ►  May (49)
    • ►  April (31)
    • ►  March (33)
    • ►  February (35)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2015 (446)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (37)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (37)
    • ►  June (38)
    • ►  May (40)
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (44)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2014 (518)
    • ►  December (38)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (29)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ►  August (47)
    • ►  July (38)
    • ►  June (45)
    • ►  May (32)
    • ►  April (48)
    • ►  March (60)
    • ►  February (45)
    • ►  January (63)
  • ▼  2013 (572)
    • ►  December (46)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (37)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ▼  August (52)
      • "always lit" not plausibly material for Christmas ...
      • Can "all natural" food be bioengineered?
      • Enzyte at Slate
      • Topside amicus briefs in Lexmark v. Static Controls
      • Another court adopts Cariou
      • Defamation suit against BBB survives anti-SLAPP mo...
      • Standard trademark claim, ill-fitting nominative u...
      • pharmaceutical equivalence case fails, including w...
      • Transformative work of the day, infomercial edition
      • Portland sues for infringement of functional publi...
      • Today's transformative work
      • authorization to use complaint is irrevocable, pre...
      • if product is objectively worse than promised, con...
      • Hangman copyright and TM claim escapes executioner...
      • Snowball fight, part X
      • unclean hands destroys false advertising damages a...
      • advertisers couldn't go after publisher for compet...
      • Welcome to Night Vale
      • Lexmark v. Static Controls: Lexmark's merits brief
      • Standing not enough for grab bag of food allegations
      • Don't call every attack on legal sufficiency a sta...
      • Limitations period bars Lanham Act claim even with...
      • Puffery with a price: 9th circuit affirms dismissa...
      • failure to communicate with borrower causes cogniz...
      • Siri, does this complaint state a claim?
      • The IP attorney Tumblr
      • On fine print
      • Changed meaning is fair use, but can't justify fee...
      • disguising antitrust violations with false public ...
      • Product placement gone very wrong
      • IPSC, Second Plenary Session: Clinical Perspective...
      • IPSC, day two, breakout session 4: long presentations
      • IPSC day 2, session 3, long presentations
      • IPSC, day 2 session 2, short presentations
      • IPSC Day Two, long presentation session 1: trademark
      • IPSC breakout 4, long presentations: design patents
      • IPSC breakout 3: short presentations/copyright
      • IPSC: long presentation session 1
      • IPSC breakout one: short papers
      • IPSC 2013, Cardozo, First Plenary Session
      • Comparative ad creates personal jurisdiction in ta...
      • image of P's product on D's site was insufficient ...
      • Kindle Worlds, destroyer of lifeworlds?
      • Keller v. EA: visual elements mean game isn't prot...
      • Multiproduct California class certified in natural...
      • The First Amendment in play: Brown v. EA
      • Reading list: consumer protection
      • copying articles for patent prosecution is fair use
      • Australian parliament: Australians should circumve...
      • reliance on general employment statistics unreason...
      • I sense a disturbance in the Force
      • Claim against Hotwire for underestimating rental c...
    • ►  July (38)
    • ►  June (36)
    • ►  May (56)
    • ►  April (59)
    • ►  March (73)
    • ►  February (41)
    • ►  January (50)
  • ►  2012 (598)
    • ►  December (56)
    • ►  November (41)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ►  September (56)
    • ►  August (53)
    • ►  July (62)
    • ►  June (62)
    • ►  May (69)
    • ►  April (45)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2011 (430)
    • ►  December (35)
    • ►  November (40)
    • ►  October (39)
    • ►  September (41)
    • ►  August (59)
    • ►  July (36)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (40)
    • ►  March (31)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (31)
  • ►  2010 (312)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (37)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (28)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (30)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (35)
    • ►  March (27)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2009 (392)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (45)
    • ►  October (42)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (43)
    • ►  July (39)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (39)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (27)
  • ►  2008 (359)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (18)
    • ►  August (33)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (42)
    • ►  April (41)
    • ►  March (49)
    • ►  February (30)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2007 (380)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (38)
    • ►  October (50)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (39)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (23)
    • ►  March (30)
    • ►  February (40)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2006 (336)
    • ►  December (32)
    • ►  November (16)
    • ►  October (34)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (45)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (42)
    • ►  February (13)
    • ►  January (46)
  • ►  2005 (50)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2004 (14)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (2)
  • ►  2003 (9)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (5)

Labels

  • 1201 (16)
  • 230 (91)
  • acpa (15)
  • advertising (277)
  • antitrust (43)
  • arbitration (3)
  • art law (34)
  • attribution (28)
  • b (1)
  • blogging (23)
  • california (516)
  • can-spam (1)
  • cfaa (12)
  • cfps (38)
  • class actions (261)
  • cmi (16)
  • comics (37)
  • commercial speech (248)
  • conferences (856)
  • consumer protection (799)
  • contracts (94)
  • copying (193)
  • copyright (1561)
  • counterfeiting (1)
  • creative commons (12)
  • cultural property (10)
  • cybersquatting (1)
  • damages (144)
  • dastar (175)
  • defamation (188)
  • derivative works (2)
  • design patent (50)
  • dilution (254)
  • disclosures (85)
  • disparagement (25)
  • dmca (194)
  • drm (71)
  • evidence (1)
  • false advertising (2772)
  • false association (2)
  • false designation of origin (1)
  • false endorsement (10)
  • fan fiction (87)
  • fanworks (190)
  • fda (261)
  • fees (33)
  • first amendment (405)
  • ftc (172)
  • g (1)
  • geographic indications (39)
  • go (1)
  • google (88)
  • insurance (67)
  • interviews (5)
  • jobs (2)
  • jurisdiction (5)
  • libraries (18)
  • misappropriation (10)
  • moral rights (18)
  • music (131)
  • my lawsuits (16)
  • my writings (104)
  • net neutrality (5)
  • parody (27)
  • patent (209)
  • patents (132)
  • peer production (27)
  • preemption (253)
  • presentations (114)
  • privacy (111)
  • procedure (144)
  • property (17)
  • reading list (301)
  • remedies (244)
  • right of publicity (245)
  • secondary liability (172)
  • securities (8)
  • standing (325)
  • surveys (87)
  • teaching (30)
  • tortious interference (106)
  • trade secrets (77)
  • trademark (1900)
  • traditional knowledge (10)
  • unconscionability (5)
  • unfairness (59)
  • warranties (14)

Things I've read

Ad Links

  • FTC Business Center Blog
  • ABA's Private Advertising Litigation Committee
  • All About Ad Law (Venable)
  • Consumer Advertising Law Blog (Arnold & Porter)
  • Consumer Law & Policy Blog (Public Citizen)
  • E-Commerce & Tech Law Blog
  • The Commercial Closet
  • The Language of Advertising

Copyright Links

  • Books Online: No US Access
  • Columbia Law Library Music Plagiarism Archive
  • Copyright Litigation Blog
  • Copyright Termination Calculator
  • Current Copyright Legal Literature
  • Fairly Used: Stanford Fair Use Project
  • Illegal Art exhibit
  • Jessica Litman's Copyright Links
  • Keep Your Copyrights (Columbia U.)
  • Larry Lessig on Free Culture
  • Madisonian.net
  • Owners, Borrowers and Thieves
  • Political Remix Video
  • Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900)
  • Respect Copyrights (movie industry site)
  • The HP Lovecraft Library
  • Useful Arts.us

Trademark Links

  • Beauty Marks (Jessica Stone Levy)
  • Counterfeit Chic
  • Current Trademark Legal Literature
  • ICANN: Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy
  • Jessica Litman's Trademark Links
  • Las Vegas Trademark Attorney
  • Pattishall IP blog
  • Search UDRP Decisions
  • Seattle Trademark Lawyer
  • Technology & Marketing Law Blog
  • The Trademark Blog
  • The TTABlog
  • UDRPLaw Net

Other Links

  • xkcd
  • Rothman's Roadmap to the Right of Publicity
  • Balkinization
  • CAFA (Class Action Fairness Act) Law Blog
  • Confessions of an Aca/Fan: Henry Jenkins
  • Feminist Law Professors
  • History of Animation in Court
  • Jotwell: Journal of Things We Like Lots
  • Michigan Telecom & Tech Law Review blog
  • Online Fandom
  • Post or Perish (Online media legal issues)
  • PropertyProf Blog
  • Rocket Docket (EDVa IP Litigation)
  • The Gray Blog (parallel imports)
 

Creative Commons/disclaimer

Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights. I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.