Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
February
(41)
- press release announcing patent/misappropriation l...
- Such watch: Amazon search results not confusing
- Lifehack ... or passing off?
- The baddest footnote on consumer confusion
- Do universities have an obligation to police healt...
- court resolves allegedly false claims about prior ...
- 7th Circuit affirms dismissal of claim against mov...
- Standing on the shoulders of vampires
- Notre Dame part 4
- Notre Dame 3
- Notre Dame part 2
- Trademark & Marketing Roundtable, Notre Dame
- Pom preempted again
- ALI part 2
- American Law Institute, Young Scholars Medal Confe...
- False advertising claim based on licensed slogan i...
- What happens to a trademark in bankruptcy?
- FitFlop motion to dismiss flops
- Property and consumer protection law collide in cl...
- Boom! Descriptive fair use defense can't be decide...
- liar, liar, hair on fire? claims against L'Oreal p...
- Lanham Act standing and "advertising or promotion"
- Empirical evidence about music parodies
- Reading list: use of scholarship in IP decisions
- Are Amazon affiliate links ads?
- The NYT on misleading calorie claims
- Top three results for "Stephen King guns" on Amazon
- Discovery violations may lead to default false adv...
- Conference announcement: disclosure and its discon...
- single sale in US creates trademark rights against...
- tax predictions unreliable as matter of law
- If you like the FTC's substantiation rule, you'll ...
- Reverse passing off and Dastar's limits
- Evaluating counterfeits
- What's the proper scope of corrective advertising?
- The left hand of false advertising: counting to $1...
- The left hand of false advertising: liability phase
- Algorithms and the out of print
- Lanham Act claims against textbook replacement not...
- Online publication protected by first sale? or jus...
- Samples aren't statements under the Lanham Act
-
▼
February
(41)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment