Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(598)
-
▼
February
(33)
- Architect can falsely claim to have designed build...
- Short bits on spam and the right of publicity
- The Bold and the Naked
- Property, contract, and copyright
- Copyright/contract and the traffic laws
- There's a fair use angle, right?
- Lanham Act false advertising claims not subject to...
- Hidden charges support pension funds's consumer pr...
- Don't make factual findings on a motion to dismiss
- Response to Worth a Thousand Words
- Copyright bullying as censorship
- $3 million bond for corrective advertising in prel...
- Congratulations! Your ad isn't commercial speech
- CMI and state anti-piracy statutes
- Sure, we blew up the economy, but not with consume...
- I wish I’d thought of the Gold Toe sock example ...
- Empirics on qui tam relators as private AGs
- Standing manages to screw up non-standing case
- False marking and consumer deception
- Is a domain name CMI?
- Guest post on teaching the mortgage crisis
- WIPIP part 4
- WIPIP part 3
- WIPIP part 2
- WIPIP part 1
- Manufacturer and reseller compete, but Lanham Act ...
- Neither Dukes nor Honda bar certification where ad...
- Nationwide class action can't proceed under Califo...
- Don't Settle with Honda, lawyer says
- Georgetown's awesome librarians come through again
- False marking as false advertising requires bad faith
- Trademark scammer, overreaching complaint?
- False video enjoined, corrective advertising ordered
-
▼
February
(33)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (50)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (538)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (53)
- class actions (278)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (273)
- conferences (930)
- consumer protection (977)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (101)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1664)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (161)
- dastar (197)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (258)
- disclosures (101)
- disparagement (32)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3148)
- false association (13)
- false designation of origin (8)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (277)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (445)
- ftc (185)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (44)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (73)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (137)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (115)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (226)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (272)
- presentations (119)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (146)
- property (18)
- reading list (311)
- remedies (283)
- right of publicity (267)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (358)
- surveys (113)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2073)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (64)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment