Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(430)
-
▼
August
(59)
- Recent reading: intentional interference with cont...
- Be careful when you put that screenshot in the com...
- eBay changed everything, except that it changed no...
- The value of goodwill
- Consumers like to own copies
- Photo finish: infringement claim smacked down
- Fair use/aesthetic functionality save the Green Day
- Orgasm Inc.
- Patent infringement claim not false advertising to...
- Whittier student writing competition
- Why mess with Texas when it's doing such a good jo...
- Movie devices as prior art
- Variety wins anti-SLAPP appeal over bad review of ...
- Boop-oop-a-doops
- Hill of beans: failure to disclose meat content dr...
- Addendum to entry-level advice
- Burying the LEED
- NYT on fake reviews
- Something smells bad: 8th Circuit reverses literal...
- I hope this is the only time I will ever mention A...
- Inducement question of the day
- Second Circuit rejects electronic database settlement
- court of appeals affirms fraud on the PTO finding
- New research with tarnishment implications
- Forthcoming article
- Supreme Court of Canada doesn't like TM surveys
- Beer thick as ... water?
- One last whirl: court makes potentially significan...
- Entry-level applicants: post your work publicly!
- Appeals court orders certification on sunblock claims
- Even specific allegations of bad intent don't defe...
- IPSC session 8
- IPSC session 7
- IPSC session 6
- IPSC session 5
- IPSC session 4
- IPSC session 3
- Ceci n'est pas une copyrighted image
- IPSC plenary 1
- IPSC session 2
- IPSC session 1
- Required ritual purification not cognizable damage...
- Extended right of publicity violation supports RIC...
- Google+ again (That's not my name)
- Third Circuit finds Havana Club label not misleadi...
- consumers not required to know details of tech, bu...
- Music copyright: some empirics
- Fear of a creative planet?
- public radio on counterfeits (etc.)
- Update on WSJ video mashup story
- Perfect 10 survives motion to dismiss against Mega...
- Google+, naming, and privacy
- IPSC schedule out
- News article nominative fair use, not commercial a...
- A new term of art
- Likely confusion leads to presumption of profits a...
- WSJ on video remix
- Followup on critic/competitor issue
- Joint post: Kozinski on DMV.org
-
▼
August
(59)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (268)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1652)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3074)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2039)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment