skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log
False advertising and more
Monday, March 03, 2008
Fair use, why did it have to be fair use?
Substantial Similarity offers a take on
Indiana Jones and the Transformative Work
. I'd heard about the film but never thought I'd get a chance to see it. At least now I can see the trailer online.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
Subscribe
*
indicates required
Email Address
*
ABA Blawg 100
Subscribe To
Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
Atom
LinkedIn
RSS 2.0
Use If This Than That (recommended but needs setup)
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Harvard Law School
Mastodon (mostly repost of blog)
My website
Email me
Bluesky
Blog Archive
►
2024
(162)
►
December
(6)
►
November
(4)
►
October
(16)
►
September
(5)
►
August
(23)
►
July
(17)
►
June
(7)
►
May
(6)
►
April
(13)
►
March
(18)
►
February
(28)
►
January
(19)
►
2023
(243)
►
December
(15)
►
November
(13)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(19)
►
August
(16)
►
July
(18)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(18)
►
April
(26)
►
March
(32)
►
February
(24)
►
January
(23)
►
2022
(223)
►
December
(30)
►
November
(12)
►
October
(11)
►
September
(12)
►
August
(19)
►
July
(11)
►
June
(25)
►
May
(8)
►
April
(23)
►
March
(20)
►
February
(37)
►
January
(15)
►
2021
(260)
►
December
(8)
►
November
(10)
►
October
(41)
►
September
(86)
►
August
(69)
►
July
(2)
►
June
(2)
►
May
(6)
►
April
(12)
►
March
(1)
►
February
(14)
►
January
(9)
►
2020
(220)
►
December
(27)
►
November
(8)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(26)
►
July
(12)
►
June
(17)
►
May
(15)
►
April
(13)
►
March
(19)
►
February
(20)
►
January
(14)
►
2019
(289)
►
December
(21)
►
November
(11)
►
October
(20)
►
September
(27)
►
August
(37)
►
July
(21)
►
June
(20)
►
May
(28)
►
April
(39)
►
March
(25)
►
February
(29)
►
January
(11)
►
2018
(225)
►
December
(14)
►
November
(17)
►
October
(12)
►
September
(16)
►
August
(26)
►
July
(12)
►
June
(18)
►
May
(22)
►
April
(29)
►
March
(19)
►
February
(27)
►
January
(13)
►
2017
(334)
►
December
(18)
►
November
(15)
►
October
(21)
►
September
(20)
►
August
(33)
►
July
(21)
►
June
(26)
►
May
(24)
►
April
(36)
►
March
(48)
►
February
(41)
►
January
(31)
►
2016
(402)
►
December
(30)
►
November
(35)
►
October
(35)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(34)
►
July
(22)
►
June
(39)
►
May
(49)
►
April
(31)
►
March
(33)
►
February
(35)
►
January
(27)
►
2015
(446)
►
December
(26)
►
November
(29)
►
October
(37)
►
September
(37)
►
August
(32)
►
July
(37)
►
June
(38)
►
May
(40)
►
April
(51)
►
March
(44)
►
February
(45)
►
January
(30)
►
2014
(518)
►
December
(38)
►
November
(25)
►
October
(29)
►
September
(48)
►
August
(47)
►
July
(38)
►
June
(45)
►
May
(32)
►
April
(48)
►
March
(60)
►
February
(45)
►
January
(63)
►
2013
(572)
►
December
(46)
►
November
(36)
►
October
(37)
►
September
(48)
►
August
(52)
►
July
(38)
►
June
(36)
►
May
(56)
►
April
(59)
►
March
(73)
►
February
(41)
►
January
(50)
►
2012
(598)
►
December
(56)
►
November
(41)
►
October
(48)
►
September
(56)
►
August
(53)
►
July
(62)
►
June
(62)
►
May
(69)
►
April
(45)
►
March
(42)
►
February
(33)
►
January
(31)
►
2011
(430)
►
December
(35)
►
November
(40)
►
October
(39)
►
September
(41)
►
August
(59)
►
July
(36)
►
June
(25)
►
May
(36)
►
April
(40)
►
March
(31)
►
February
(17)
►
January
(31)
►
2010
(312)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(37)
►
October
(16)
►
September
(34)
►
August
(28)
►
July
(19)
►
June
(30)
►
May
(26)
►
April
(35)
►
March
(27)
►
February
(10)
►
January
(25)
►
2009
(392)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(45)
►
October
(42)
►
September
(23)
►
August
(43)
►
July
(39)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(28)
►
April
(37)
►
March
(39)
►
February
(22)
►
January
(27)
▼
2008
(359)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(20)
►
October
(34)
►
September
(18)
►
August
(33)
►
July
(29)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(42)
►
April
(41)
▼
March
(49)
Seventh Circuit opinion in Q-Ray case
Predatorix possibly defamatory but not infringing
State publicity claims are not preempted by the CDA
Fordham IP: Free speech and P2P issues
Fordham IP: Copyright Exceptions and Limitations
Fordham IP Law & Policy Conference: copyright part 2
Fordham IP Law & Policy Conference: copyright in t...
Hidden Wolf not hidden enough
ABA Antitrust section: Lanham Act roundup
ABA Antitrust section: consumer protection roundup
Death sentence for domain names?
Organization for Transformative Works membership d...
FDA preemption revisited
Consumer protection in the driver's seat
Fellowship opportunity for budding IP academics
Dioramas in the Washington Post
Low-res transformativeness
Deception about defamation
Upcoming conference: IP/Gender
Plagiarism detection is fair use
Diebold wins one voting machine battle
Consumer protection: Bear Sterns edition
Copyright and public consciousness
The IP angle on the Spitzer story
Hotel horror story is consumer fraud, not common-l...
Not the usual shark cartilage false advertising claim
What do file-sharers have in common with discrimin...
Short-seller SLAPPs back
Ruffian in a race for priority
Article on consumer protection lawsuits and regula...
Red light for Viacom on punitive damages
An unusual use of geographic terms
Hoist on their own Vista: internal Microsoft compl...
Longhorn is long shot for federal fame
"Grassroots" group, but not grass-fed
FDA letters not official FDA action for Lanham Act...
News about false advertising of health products
Extraterritoriality of false advertising law
Transformation by subtraction
False claims to retailers violate Lanham Act
fraud on the consumer market rejected
Vista Capable class certified
Translators needed
Save a hip, sue a critic
School daze: anti-fake course a fake
Fair use, why did it have to be fair use?
Arbor day: wine trademark dispute continues
Not that there's anything defamatory about that
Fees in false advertising and copyright cases
►
February
(30)
►
January
(16)
►
2007
(380)
►
December
(22)
►
November
(38)
►
October
(50)
►
September
(34)
►
August
(39)
►
July
(32)
►
June
(29)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(23)
►
March
(30)
►
February
(40)
►
January
(23)
►
2006
(336)
►
December
(32)
►
November
(16)
►
October
(34)
►
September
(22)
►
August
(45)
►
July
(34)
►
June
(21)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(11)
►
March
(42)
►
February
(13)
►
January
(46)
►
2005
(50)
►
December
(13)
►
November
(14)
►
October
(1)
►
September
(2)
►
August
(3)
►
July
(2)
►
June
(6)
►
May
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(2)
►
February
(3)
►
January
(2)
►
2004
(14)
►
December
(3)
►
November
(9)
►
October
(2)
►
2003
(9)
►
December
(1)
►
November
(2)
►
October
(1)
►
September
(5)
Labels
1201
(19)
1202
(2)
230
(96)
acpa
(16)
advertising
(283)
antitrust
(49)
arbitration
(3)
art law
(36)
attribution
(28)
b
(1)
blogging
(23)
california
(536)
can-spam
(1)
cfaa
(12)
cfps
(48)
class actions
(277)
cmi
(19)
comics
(37)
commercial speech
(269)
conferences
(917)
consumer protection
(947)
content moderation
(3)
contracts
(100)
copying
(195)
copyright
(1656)
counterfeiting
(1)
creative commons
(12)
cultural property
(10)
cybersquatting
(1)
damages
(159)
dastar
(196)
defamation
(203)
derivative works
(2)
design patent
(57)
dilution
(257)
disclosures
(96)
disparagement
(29)
dmca
(203)
drm
(72)
evidence
(1)
false advertising
(3078)
false association
(12)
false designation of origin
(6)
false endorsement
(13)
fan fiction
(87)
fanworks
(190)
fda
(273)
fees
(35)
first amendment
(442)
ftc
(184)
g
(1)
geographic indications
(43)
go
(1)
google
(89)
insurance
(72)
interviews
(5)
jobs
(2)
jurisdiction
(5)
libraries
(18)
misappropriation
(10)
moral rights
(18)
music
(136)
my lawsuits
(16)
my writings
(113)
net neutrality
(5)
parody
(27)
patent
(224)
patents
(136)
peer production
(27)
preclusion
(1)
preemption
(268)
presentations
(118)
privacy
(113)
procedure
(145)
property
(18)
reading list
(308)
remedies
(275)
right of publicity
(264)
secondary liability
(178)
securities
(8)
standing
(354)
surveys
(106)
teaching
(38)
tortious interference
(116)
trade secrets
(81)
trademark
(2042)
traditional knowledge
(11)
unconscionability
(5)
unfairness
(62)
warranties
(14)
Things I've read
My Library
at
LibraryThing
No comments:
Post a Comment