skip to main
|
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log
False advertising and more
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Right of publicity trick or transformative treat?
Slate on celebrity Halloween masks.
I do wonder whether celebrities with no shame, like Paris Hilton, could make a better false endorsement/right of publicity claim than Hillary Clinton or Rudy Guiliani.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
Subscribe
*
indicates required
Email Address
*
ABA Blawg 100
Subscribe To
Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
Atom
LinkedIn
RSS 2.0
Use If This Than That (recommended but needs setup)
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Harvard Law School
Mastodon (mostly repost of blog)
My website
Email me
Bluesky
Blog Archive
►
2025
(33)
►
March
(1)
►
February
(19)
►
January
(13)
►
2024
(166)
►
December
(10)
►
November
(4)
►
October
(16)
►
September
(5)
►
August
(23)
►
July
(17)
►
June
(7)
►
May
(6)
►
April
(13)
►
March
(18)
►
February
(28)
►
January
(19)
►
2023
(243)
►
December
(15)
►
November
(13)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(19)
►
August
(16)
►
July
(18)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(18)
►
April
(26)
►
March
(32)
►
February
(24)
►
January
(23)
►
2022
(223)
►
December
(30)
►
November
(12)
►
October
(11)
►
September
(12)
►
August
(19)
►
July
(11)
►
June
(25)
►
May
(8)
►
April
(23)
►
March
(20)
►
February
(37)
►
January
(15)
►
2021
(260)
►
December
(8)
►
November
(10)
►
October
(41)
►
September
(86)
►
August
(69)
►
July
(2)
►
June
(2)
►
May
(6)
►
April
(12)
►
March
(1)
►
February
(14)
►
January
(9)
►
2020
(220)
►
December
(27)
►
November
(8)
►
October
(17)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(26)
►
July
(12)
►
June
(17)
►
May
(15)
►
April
(13)
►
March
(19)
►
February
(20)
►
January
(14)
►
2019
(289)
►
December
(21)
►
November
(11)
►
October
(20)
►
September
(27)
►
August
(37)
►
July
(21)
►
June
(20)
►
May
(28)
►
April
(39)
►
March
(25)
►
February
(29)
►
January
(11)
►
2018
(225)
►
December
(14)
►
November
(17)
►
October
(12)
►
September
(16)
►
August
(26)
►
July
(12)
►
June
(18)
►
May
(22)
►
April
(29)
►
March
(19)
►
February
(27)
►
January
(13)
►
2017
(334)
►
December
(18)
►
November
(15)
►
October
(21)
►
September
(20)
►
August
(33)
►
July
(21)
►
June
(26)
►
May
(24)
►
April
(36)
►
March
(48)
►
February
(41)
►
January
(31)
►
2016
(402)
►
December
(30)
►
November
(35)
►
October
(35)
►
September
(32)
►
August
(34)
►
July
(22)
►
June
(39)
►
May
(49)
►
April
(31)
►
March
(33)
►
February
(35)
►
January
(27)
►
2015
(446)
►
December
(26)
►
November
(29)
►
October
(37)
►
September
(37)
►
August
(32)
►
July
(37)
►
June
(38)
►
May
(40)
►
April
(51)
►
March
(44)
►
February
(45)
►
January
(30)
►
2014
(518)
►
December
(38)
►
November
(25)
►
October
(29)
►
September
(48)
►
August
(47)
►
July
(38)
►
June
(45)
►
May
(32)
►
April
(48)
►
March
(60)
►
February
(45)
►
January
(63)
►
2013
(572)
►
December
(46)
►
November
(36)
►
October
(37)
►
September
(48)
►
August
(52)
►
July
(38)
►
June
(36)
►
May
(56)
►
April
(59)
►
March
(73)
►
February
(41)
►
January
(50)
►
2012
(598)
►
December
(56)
►
November
(41)
►
October
(48)
►
September
(56)
►
August
(53)
►
July
(62)
►
June
(62)
►
May
(69)
►
April
(45)
►
March
(42)
►
February
(33)
►
January
(31)
►
2011
(430)
►
December
(35)
►
November
(40)
►
October
(39)
►
September
(41)
►
August
(59)
►
July
(36)
►
June
(25)
►
May
(36)
►
April
(40)
►
March
(31)
►
February
(17)
►
January
(31)
►
2010
(312)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(37)
►
October
(16)
►
September
(34)
►
August
(28)
►
July
(19)
►
June
(30)
►
May
(26)
►
April
(35)
►
March
(27)
►
February
(10)
►
January
(25)
►
2009
(392)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(45)
►
October
(42)
►
September
(23)
►
August
(43)
►
July
(39)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(28)
►
April
(37)
►
March
(39)
►
February
(22)
►
January
(27)
►
2008
(359)
►
December
(25)
►
November
(20)
►
October
(34)
►
September
(18)
►
August
(33)
►
July
(29)
►
June
(22)
►
May
(42)
►
April
(41)
►
March
(49)
►
February
(30)
►
January
(16)
▼
2007
(380)
►
December
(22)
►
November
(38)
▼
October
(50)
Right of publicity trick or transformative treat?
False advertising in the global supply chain
Batman v. Batman
McCarthy on Using Someone Else's Trademark
Not Fooling Anybody
Avis tries harder...
Pancreatic enzyme can't dissolve Lanham Act claims
I Can't Believe It's Not Peat
FDA preemption goes to the dogs
Hybrid vigor: Honda class action claims survive
Recent press: Kevin Trudeau
WSJ columnist embraces net neutrality
Deceptively misdescriptive?
Trademark registration monitoring software
Lost market share isn't irreparable injury
It's a dirty job, but there's competition to do it
Editing as critique
The FDA's wrong turn on preemption
Drug ad fraud claims remanded to state court
False advertising about advertising
Barron tribute: comparative perspectives
Barron tribute, panel 3: comments and questions
Barron tribute, panel 3: me
Barron tribute, panel 3: Neil Netanel
Barron tribute, panel 2
Barron symposium, Panel 1
Justice Breyer at George Washington
Australian Gold-digging: reseller of genuine goods...
iTeach
Ragin' Cajun: court rules against Louisiana's seaf...
“An invitation to lie with impunity”
Upcoming copyright event
She's a brick and I'm diapering slowly
Personalized publicity
Santa Clara dilution conference: Comparative Analy...
Santa Clara dilution conference: Dilution Regulati...
Santa Clara dilution conference: Dilution Regulati...
Santa Clara dilution conference: Consumer Percepti...
Trademarks without Pity: What is a source identify...
Santa Clara dilution conference: Consumer Percepti...
Puffing Cheetos?
Trademark dilution at Santa Clara
The basketball damages
Video for Cyberprofs
Digital smackdown
Guide for the perplexed: seeking stories about res...
Dastar defeats stealth marketing claim
This charming lawsuit
Third Circuit gives broad preemptive scope to FDCA
WIPIP, Panel 6
►
September
(34)
►
August
(39)
►
July
(32)
►
June
(29)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(23)
►
March
(30)
►
February
(40)
►
January
(23)
►
2006
(336)
►
December
(32)
►
November
(16)
►
October
(34)
►
September
(22)
►
August
(45)
►
July
(34)
►
June
(21)
►
May
(20)
►
April
(11)
►
March
(42)
►
February
(13)
►
January
(46)
►
2005
(50)
►
December
(13)
►
November
(14)
►
October
(1)
►
September
(2)
►
August
(3)
►
July
(2)
►
June
(6)
►
May
(1)
►
April
(1)
►
March
(2)
►
February
(3)
►
January
(2)
►
2004
(14)
►
December
(3)
►
November
(9)
►
October
(2)
►
2003
(9)
►
December
(1)
►
November
(2)
►
October
(1)
►
September
(5)
Labels
1201
(19)
1202
(2)
230
(96)
acpa
(16)
advertising
(283)
antitrust
(49)
arbitration
(3)
art law
(36)
attribution
(28)
b
(1)
blogging
(23)
california
(536)
can-spam
(1)
cfaa
(12)
cfps
(50)
class actions
(278)
cmi
(19)
comics
(37)
commercial speech
(271)
conferences
(923)
consumer protection
(953)
content moderation
(3)
contracts
(101)
copying
(195)
copyright
(1662)
counterfeiting
(1)
creative commons
(12)
cultural property
(10)
cybersquatting
(1)
damages
(161)
dastar
(197)
defamation
(203)
derivative works
(2)
design patent
(57)
dilution
(257)
disclosures
(97)
disparagement
(30)
dmca
(203)
drm
(72)
evidence
(1)
false advertising
(3102)
false association
(12)
false designation of origin
(7)
false endorsement
(13)
fan fiction
(87)
fanworks
(190)
fda
(275)
fees
(35)
first amendment
(443)
ftc
(185)
g
(1)
geographic indications
(43)
go
(1)
google
(89)
insurance
(72)
interviews
(5)
jobs
(2)
jurisdiction
(5)
libraries
(18)
misappropriation
(10)
moral rights
(18)
music
(137)
my lawsuits
(16)
my writings
(114)
net neutrality
(5)
parody
(27)
patent
(226)
patents
(136)
peer production
(27)
preclusion
(1)
preemption
(270)
presentations
(118)
privacy
(113)
procedure
(146)
property
(18)
reading list
(309)
remedies
(278)
right of publicity
(266)
secondary liability
(178)
securities
(8)
standing
(354)
surveys
(109)
teaching
(38)
tortious interference
(116)
trade secrets
(81)
trademark
(2051)
traditional knowledge
(11)
unconscionability
(5)
unfairness
(63)
warranties
(14)
Things I've read
My Library
at
LibraryThing
No comments:
Post a Comment