Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(380)
-
▼
June
(29)
- Half-naked licensing
- McDonald's still lovin' it
- NYT reviews Andrew Keen on the Cult of the Amateur
- ABA Journal on consumer class actions
- Another false patent marking as false advertising ...
- Lipitor class action proceeds, in part
- Pirate hard?
- This blog has not yet been rated
- Taking a name in vain
- Product placement and "product placement"
- A corny argument
- Ghost in the machine: "fraud on a computer" claim ...
- Good Documentary, Bad Documentary
- Recent press: roleplaying games
- Blue-sky law: court rejects false advertising claim
- How Harry Potter really ends
- Hatred as a motive for copying
- Is reposting candid photos of women fair use?
- PR savvy from worm poop
- False inventorship claim isn't false advertising
- More on market circularity
- Rules of Engagement revisited
- Like a free ride when you've already paid?
- Recent reading on the FTC
- Now taste the lawsuit
- Announcement: an archive of our own
- Amateurs and prose
- A ghoulish false advertising ruling
- User-generated content and privately owned public ...
-
▼
June
(29)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
1 comment:
FYI - Its a parody of the last scene of the Sopranos TV series. So it is really a double parody use (character names and objects from Harry Potter and plot and scenes a faire from Sopranos including the non-scene a faire abrupt (go to black) ending).
Post a Comment