A couple of Third Circuit amicus briefs (AI training and false advertising harm)

Thomson Reuters v. Ross, arguing that training is fair use. With Edward Lee of Santa Clara Law, Matthew Sag of Emory University, Pamela Samuelson of UC Berkeley School of Law, Christopher John Sprigman of New York University School of Law.

And an amicus with Alexandra Roberts in support of a petition for rehearing in CareDX v. Natera, discussed here. The argument is that circumstantial evidence of harm can suffice in a Lanham Act false advertising case.