 |
| Shopify ad: You could make lip balm. Or you could corner the lip balm market. |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2019
(289)
-
▼
September
(27)
- small wonder: sleeve undergarment isn't valid trad...
- Suffolk University IP Conference, Oct. 29-30
- Innovation, Justice, and Globalization: A Celebrat...
- Allergan gets small damages award in case against ...
- chilling effect: competitor's name in text of keyw...
- Inability to quantify damages justifies finding ir...
- "studies prove" as puffery?
- Laches bars Peloton Magazine's claim against Peloton
- pharmaco gets summary judgment against compounder ...
- scientific debates can ordinarily be resolved in f...
- "Hawaiian" plus imagery isn't deceptive indication...
- Southern Poverty Law Center's "hate group" designa...
- coconut milk could mislead by claiming "no cholest...
- outdated website uses preserve TM infringement cla...
- calling NBC's lawyers: gold company can claim #1 r...
- Use of under 10% of photos in catalogue raisonné w...
- Not worth a hill of beans: can label showing mound...
- ownership/control of whole company isn't enough fo...
- 9th Circuit drives big hole through 230(c)(2) immu...
- Reading list: Cheating Pays
- You know antitrust law is failing when ...
- false patent marking and implicit claims of Nobel ...
- ex-employees with new company trigger false advert...
- even more corn syrup
- Even more cocaine
- Does Rogers v. Grimaldi apply to false advertising...
- fine print won't necessarily fix misleading compar...
-
▼
September
(27)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2039)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment