 |
| Is this really a Pop Tart? |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(334)
-
▼
February
(41)
- Reading list: women in technology
- Bridging the Gap Between the Federal Courts and th...
- Blast from the past: pleading falsity based on sci...
- Craigslist credit scam by affiliate leads to FTC a...
- Re:Create features fan vidders for fair use week
- Court won't hear false advertising and contributor...
- Reading list: aesthetic nondiscrimination and fair...
- State law can't protect uncopyrightable design for...
- Gun gag rule case provides good overview of post-R...
- Reading list: poetry and copyright norms
- Seen in Cambridge
- The trademark part of ASTM v. PublicResource.org
- GM's defeat device is almost by definition fraudul...
- claims about others' patent infringement can be fa...
- Doctor's evaluation of another doctor's treatment ...
- Use of P's photos to advertise D's goods must be c...
- Incontestability precludes non-listed defenses, co...
- Spyware or spam?
- This is not NORML: court of appeals finds ISU viol...
- when is a law firm "national"? hub-and-spoke firm ...
- pool party: lawsuit raises survey and TM priority ...
- Juxtaposition is transformative for RoP purposes, ...
- Lexmark's harm requirement shields XYZ's comparati...
- Challenging materiality when literal falsity is co...
- Alleging that unauthorized reseller sells old prod...
- calling a rival "imitation" is neither defamatory ...
- WIPIP, part 5
- WIPIP, part 4
- WIPIP, part 3
- WIPIP, part 2
- WIPIP part one
- P&G fails to clean up "natural" suit over baby wipes
- Latest additions to my collection
- use of P's jewelry in D's ad is regular passing of...
- Transformative work of the day, why would you even...
- Blast from the past: claims to comply with vague i...
- Advertising a phone with an unauthorized screensho...
- Blast from the past: false price claims insufficie...
- Political ad isn't commercial, can't be basis of L...
- Failure to show causation leads court to overturn ...
- older case about materiality v. consumer skepticis...
-
▼
February
(41)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment