Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(334)
-
▼
January
(31)
- TCPA survives strict scrutiny
- Amazon escapes liability for ads & emails touting ...
- Disgorgement isn't distinguishable from restitutio...
- For law students: Notre Dame summer IP program
- Another "omissions about slave labor" case fails i...
- Older case: placement of medical device on market ...
- False claims of discounts cause Article III injury
- Placebo effect means customer satisfaction doesn't...
- Food & Drug Law Institute writing competition
- Identifying Boundaries in Patent and Trademark Law.
- If you don't like low-cost imitator brands, you'll...
- What's in the box? Not a valid agreement to arbit...
- Are you being served? Omission claim based on "vir...
- Pipe dreams: expert spokesperson liable for false ...
- Mass. anti-SLAPP law/litigation privilege doesn't ...
- National Constitution Center Podcast on Tam
- Seen around town: transformative works of the day,...
- 9th Circuit rejects Slep-Tone's anti-copying claim...
- Lee v. Tam post-argument
- video of Evil Twin debate on Tam
- Transformative work of the day, Lin-Manuel Miranda...
- It's a Tam, Tam, Tam world
- Trump's trademarks
- Question for those who know European privacy law
- Harvard IP fellowship: applications sought
- Federal Circuit Symposium at AU on Patent & TM law...
- 10th Annual Evil Twin Debate,"Free Speech or Free ...
- Reading list: anti-surcharge rules and behavioral ...
- Reading list: 2016 TM year in review
- Lexmark harm requirement reopens gap between regis...
- Extraterritorial conduct isn't relevant to laches,...
-
▼
January
(31)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (948)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1657)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3079)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment