Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(402)
-
▼
December
(30)
- Contracts can last longer than headaches: 1990 con...
- Does this image evoke the Starbucks logo?
- Hamilton, the gift that keeps on giving ...
- MOB receives early Xmas present: 2d Circuit affirm...
- Update on my suit against ICE
- kefir confusion: court finds definition of little-...
- Court finds Lanham Act laches on the pleadings giv...
- The NYT on Frederik Colting's latest endeavor
- SCOTUSblog symposium on Tam
- Facebook, Twitter fans could substitute for sales ...
- Can bait & switch cause actionable harm even thoug...
- Trademark/(c)/ROP question of the day, Stephen Kin...
- Falsely claiming TM ownership isn't false advertis...
- Second Circuit will trust FDA on drug facts, not o...
- Exposure to false advertising doesn't create Artic...
- When does a false advertising case create a right ...
- Business betrayal isn't false advertising, could b...
- Announcing the Open Source Property Casebook
- Reading list: why search engines shouldn't impleme...
- NYIPLA IP writing competition
- Trademark questions of the day, pictorial edition
- Copyright question of the day, Colting edition
- Fifth Circuit reverses multimillion-dollar antitru...
- Mardi Gras bead dogs live
- ... and the Best Title of the Year award goes to M...
- Update re: DMCA re-registration
- Failing to disclose refund policy does not make pr...
- Saving people, suing things: TM lawsuit over -hunt...
- Ugly facts doom "Life is Beautiful" infringement c...
- DMCA agent re-registration process removes one ann...
-
▼
December
(30)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1653)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3075)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (307)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2040)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
3 comments:
And typography!
Looks too close for comfort to me.
My nine year old glanced at my screen while I was reading this and asked if it was copying Starbucks.
Post a Comment