Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2016
(402)
-
▼
April
(31)
- FESC: Relax about Town of Gilbert
- FESC: Trademark Registration and Free Speech
- FESC: First Amendment Theory and Coverage
- FESC: Hate Speech, Political Conversations, and Ci...
- Freedom of Expression Scholars Conference at Yale:...
- FTC rules don't explain excessive redactions in FT...
- Empirical analysis of chilling effects
- Website can use DMCA safe harbor for acts of its i...
- Two right of publicity possibilities in the news
- Cal. court sensibly rejects Fourth Circuit's GNC r...
- Flagging supplement case revived
- When is confusion unlikely for purposes of a motio...
- District court still rejects contribution/contribu...
- All transformative from here: 2013 case about musi...
- Minimal pleading of responsibility suffices to eva...
- Student IP writing competition from the Virginia Bar
- Expert testimony in false advertising cases can re...
- Further results from my FOIA case against ICE
- Comments on section 512 from the OTW and a few others
- announcing product launch and pricing can be false...
- "Excessive use of professional reviewers" might be...
- Copyright Registration Practice with Robert Kasunic
- Organization for Transformative Works fundraising ...
- Go to the mattresses: Tempurpedic wins TRO against...
- No mark, no false designation of origin is still t...
- Something smells: new product makes competitor's c...
- idea/expression distinction saves Toyota ad from i...
- Copyright Registration Practice with Rob Kasunic
- Trademark issues seen in NYC
- comments on 512 from the Organization for Transfor...
- User-generated discontent: patents, gender, and in...
-
▼
April
(31)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (268)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1652)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3074)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2039)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment