Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(572)
-
▼
June
(36)
- Transformative work of the day
- Disputed scientific conclusions not actionable und...
- Sauce for goose isn't (chocolate) sauce for gander...
- Voluntary change entitles California plaintiff to ...
- HP's power and performance claims were mere puffery
- Giant sucking sound: vacuum claims false
- Grab bag of food claims survives preemption, not R...
- "Fan use" or fair use?
- Descriptive or nominative?
- Revenge is tweet
- New book chapter on Barbie and IP exceptions
- Rolling Stone writes about fraud and puffery
- Sharing v. stealing
- Disparagement?
- NY consumer protection standing exists when decept...
- No preliminary injunction in consumer class action
- back pocket logo as "title" for advertising injury...
- NYT on FTC case against internet marketer
- Typicality defeats a food class action
- Copyright in real estate listings survives Lanham ...
- Court misapplies Dastar because customers buy phot...
- Long, unhappy post on Hart v. EA
- Cute rephrasing of Prince v. Cariou
- #sincere? Slate on sponsored tweets and disclosure
- What does it take to plead bad faith assertion of ...
- Second Circuit makes descriptive fair use more con...
- Remotely hosted images can't provide clear and con...
- FDA warning letter doesn't trigger primary jurisdi...
- UK's Advertising Standards Authority on misleading...
- New commercial speech lawsuit on disclosure wording
- His hair was perfect: werewolf erotica and images ...
- Heaven knows I'm Morrissey now
- There goes my summer: Lanham Act standing case get...
- Washington Metro goes after parody dating site
- Reading list: user-generated content in Canada
- Another story on cover songs as misleading
-
▼
June
(36)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment