Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(598)
-
▼
November
(41)
- FTC wins against "make money fast" claims
- Court dismisses "natural" claim on primary jurisdi...
- Contract language isn't commercial speech?
- Unusual 230 defense against virtual ownership claims
- Okay, very obvious joke
- Routine California class certification highlights ...
- ABA Journal Blawg 100
- Google raters' manual
- How to make a supercut: it's about power
- Reading list: SEO manipulation
- Today's trademark question
- Brave new world that has such software in it
- RTFS
- Kids as less careful consumers?
- Math and advertising
- Reproduction and accuracy
- The Hollywood Reporter on TM claims against films
- Self-dilution
- Pictures or it's not false advertising
- "original" claim as false advertising
- Referential uses don't cause blurring: an example
- Boop-oop-a-do-over
- Descriptive trademark means uniqueness claim wasn'...
- Oral music deal leads to multiple claims and Dasta...
- Fair use question of the day
- My former colleague David Vladeck at the FTC
- News for storage jars who vote
- Self-dilution?
- Safeway and Alfred Bell v. Catalda
- Fox and frauds: Cablevision spat is breach of cont...
- ... but consumers do need to satisfy 9(b) in Calif...
- Section 43 isn't subject to Rule 9(b) standards
- recommended reading: images and false advertising
- Privacy and substantiation
- Appropriation, artist
- latest political parody of a song
- domain name may be noncommercial speech; TM rules ...
- Part numbers don't function as trademarks in robus...
- Political Joe Isuzu
- The National Archives blogs about trademark law
- IP & Gender at AU
-
▼
November
(41)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment