Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(430)
-
▼
December
(35)
- Charbucks prevails over Starbucks on remand
- iPad "just like a book" claim is puffery
- Release trumps right of publicity claim even when ...
- Holdover franchisee engaged in counterfeiting
- Substantial similarity?
- No class treatment for "cure" claims
- First sale slightly protects unauthorized reseller
- particularity, but not public interest, in false a...
- Somebody save me!
- Number one fan, number two infringement?
- First Amendment symposium
- False marking repled as consumer protection claim
- UMG v. Veoh
- The claim is dismissed but the insurance lingers
- Bankruptcy and going out of business sales
- News for storage jars, right of publicity edition
- Snowball's chance: TM claim as false advertising
- Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. Sno Wizard Hold...
- New publication: Scary Monsters: Hybrids, Mashups,...
- Washington Post on ads masquerading as editorial c...
- California law and Lanham Act converge to condemn ...
- Claims of international scope count as "designatio...
- The bond Kevin Trudeau doesn't want you to know about
- Larry Sager's Etsy store
- Ada Initiative fundraising drive for women in open...
- Megaupload
- Like beatings for elephants
- Insured's bad behavior destroys coverage for TM in...
- Bank plaintiffs mostly lose data breach-based clai...
- Failure to show actual product dooms survey
- Reading list: on dilution
- Laws, like sausages, cease to inspire respect in p...
- Plagiarism and ethnocentrism
- Dilution review question of the day
- DMCA exemptions again
-
▼
December
(35)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (948)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1657)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3079)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (114)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment