Today's hypo: How should the trademark/right of publicity analysis go?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(430)
-
▼
September
(41)
- Claim against contact lens solution preempted by FDCA
- No state law standing for manufacturer against ret...
- Copyright and pre-1978 dissertations on microfilm
- Of historical interest
- generic drug seller avoids injunction
- No cause of action against purchaser under state c...
- Abstract claim of lost goodwill isn't irreparable ...
- Eavesdrop on a Lanham Act Oral Argument
- functionally worthless insurance might be actionable
- New book review by me
- Securities law and the contraction of standing
- Presumption against finding literal falsity defeat...
- New piece on vidding, with Francesca Coppa
- FDA weighs on on "corn sugar" for HFCS.
- House brands in Australia
- Gray market goods presumptively cause irreparable ...
- No more lawsuit (until plaintiff lathers, rinses a...
- No class action for salons; court finds survey of ...
- Call for papers: 2012 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment...
- Testing lab's claims of accuracy not false despite...
- Dastar only covers ideas, court mistakenly suggests
- Sage advice from Eric Goldman
- Penny Dreadful: FTC succeeds against negative opti...
- You'll get a workout reading this opinion
- Wal-Mart doesn't defeat consumer protection class ...
- Panels on advertising law careers for new lawyers
- Court punts to jury, then announces it won't follo...
- Video game is transformative use of player's image
- Seen at the party store
- It's my distributor and my competitor
- Expert testimony on meaning of term allowed in pha...
- Now, an actual reading recommendation
- Lawyer's general quality claims are puffing
- Recent reading: litigious Americans
- Washington Declaration on Intellectual Property an...
- Voluntary food marketing principles aren't unconst...
- Can failure to leave be contractually binding?
- State insurance law precludes Lanham Act claim
- Ceci n'est pas une pillow pet
- Deceptive terms and conditions void contract in en...
- My question is whether Honda HQ approved the deale...
-
▼
September
(41)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment