Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(430)
-
▼
July
(36)
- Advertising & Marketing Law casebook materials now...
- Shots across the bow: Energy companies lose variou...
- Native American organization has constitutional st...
- Blog comments not trustworthy evidence of consumer...
- False marking misleadingness theory rejected; only...
- Travel company falls into the gap: confusion, but ...
- Farhad Manjoo as unrepentant but less frequent Bit...
- Failed Lanham Act case not sanctionable
- False advertising claim for false development/excl...
- Critic or competitor? Conspiracy allegation preser...
- Substitution as per contract terms was not infringing
- NYT study on why people share online
- A competitor creates false images of your product
- Trademark bully of the day
- Rereading the oral argument in Wal-Mart
- Best copyright related story title of the year?
- Counterfeit with actual counters
- Fan fiction discussion on NPR
- John Tehranian's Infringement Nation
- SC Johnson Greenlist cases settle
- A link between disparagement and hacking?
- Third-party subpoena allowed to seek substantiatio...
- Telling tales out of school: new regs on misleadin...
- small note on Brownmark Films v. Comedy Partners
- A reason to bring coordinate state law claims in L...
- Job opportunities: IP clinic director and Berkeley...
- Rogue site of the week or whack-a-mole?
- IP philosophy question of the day
- Time story on fan fiction
- Pushcart war: false designation of origin counterc...
- Copyright gets around the world while the public d...
- Law of Advertising treatise review
- Trying Google+
- Today's trademark question
- Historical false advertising
- Everybody in the pool: standing makes case needles...
-
▼
July
(36)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (269)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (947)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1656)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (203)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (96)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (203)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3078)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (308)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (264)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (116)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2042)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
2 comments:
Yes, please!
I'm not sure which Mark this is! Drop me an email and I'll send them on.
Post a Comment