Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Rebecca Tushnet
False advertising and more
Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet
Email subscription
ABA Blawg 100
Posts
Subscribe via RSS or LinkedIn
"Bright young [wo]man"/"Yo, who the F is this?"
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(430)
-
▼
January
(31)
- Copyright in maps: graphic elements or compilation...
- Kwikset reversed; misrepresentation about producti...
- Manufacturer has standing when competitor claims t...
- FDLI part 2: Jonathan Emord, me, and counsel from ...
- FDLI’s Food Advertising, Marketing and Labeling Co...
- Dastar and CMI
- A mouse's tale: competing rodenticide claims enjoined
- Skin job: unauthorized reseller's bad acts doom it
- Printer error: Strict liability preserves certain ...
- A yummy survey case: Pom Wonderful again
- Reading: German fair use?
- Salons have standing to challenge "salon-only" adv...
- YouTube and the DMCA
- Method of proving Lanham Act violation spurs count...
- Seven seconds in heaven: Ed Sullivan clip is fair use
- Violating exclusive territory isn't TM infringement
- Student writing competition: Virginia
- Writing opportunity in IP
- Recent reading: fair use categories
- Catch that train: copyright and false origin claim...
- Today's copyright/trademark hypothetical
- Gorillas no longer in our midst: GM wins against r...
- Card counters aren't reasonable consumers
- Motion to dismiss unfair competition claim granted...
- Customer-competitors have standing
- Trademark claims related to patent claims, not cov...
- Failure to credit isn't disparagement for purposes...
- Minnesota light cigarette class action properly ce...
- eReader lawsuit goes forward
- Standing as factual issue
- Disaggregation as transformation?
-
▼
January
(31)
Labels
- 1201 (19)
- 1202 (2)
- 230 (96)
- acpa (16)
- advertising (283)
- antitrust (49)
- arbitration (3)
- art law (36)
- attribution (28)
- b (1)
- blogging (23)
- california (536)
- can-spam (1)
- cfaa (12)
- cfps (48)
- class actions (277)
- cmi (19)
- comics (37)
- commercial speech (268)
- conferences (917)
- consumer protection (946)
- content moderation (3)
- contracts (100)
- copying (195)
- copyright (1652)
- counterfeiting (1)
- creative commons (12)
- cultural property (10)
- cybersquatting (1)
- damages (159)
- dastar (196)
- defamation (202)
- derivative works (2)
- design patent (57)
- dilution (257)
- disclosures (95)
- disparagement (29)
- dmca (202)
- drm (72)
- evidence (1)
- false advertising (3074)
- false association (12)
- false designation of origin (6)
- false endorsement (13)
- fan fiction (87)
- fanworks (190)
- fda (273)
- fees (35)
- first amendment (442)
- ftc (184)
- g (1)
- geographic indications (43)
- go (1)
- google (89)
- insurance (72)
- interviews (5)
- jobs (2)
- jurisdiction (5)
- libraries (18)
- misappropriation (10)
- moral rights (18)
- music (136)
- my lawsuits (16)
- my writings (113)
- net neutrality (5)
- parody (27)
- patent (224)
- patents (136)
- peer production (27)
- preclusion (1)
- preemption (268)
- presentations (118)
- privacy (113)
- procedure (145)
- property (18)
- reading list (306)
- remedies (275)
- right of publicity (263)
- secondary liability (178)
- securities (8)
- standing (354)
- surveys (106)
- teaching (38)
- tortious interference (114)
- trade secrets (81)
- trademark (2039)
- traditional knowledge (11)
- unconscionability (5)
- unfairness (62)
- warranties (14)
Things I've read
Creative Commons/disclaimer
Text on this blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. Pictures and works quoted may be subject to other parties' copyrights.
I speak for myself. On this blog, I do not and cannot speak for Harvard Law School, the Organization for Transformative Works and/or AO3.
No comments:
Post a Comment